IBM QualityStage vs Microsoft Data Quality Services comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
208 views|142 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
180 views|82 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM QualityStage and Microsoft Data Quality Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, SAP, Talend and others in Data Quality.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Quality Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The pricing is in the midrange. It's not cheap, but it depends on the licenses you require."
  • More Microsoft Data Quality Services Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:This solution is particularly useful for data enrichment.
    Top Answer:The pricing is in the midrange. It's not cheap, but it depends on the licenses you require. We are an enterprise partner and have an enterprise agreement, so we may not see it as a separate cost.
    Top Answer:It's actually typical of Microsoft products. It's not overly easy, but at the same time, it's not like trying to fix a pipe that's burst. You do need to configure a few things to tackle some issues… more »
    Ranking
    18th
    out of 56 in Data Quality
    Views
    208
    Comparisons
    142
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    14th
    out of 56 in Data Quality
    Views
    180
    Comparisons
    82
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    535
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    QualityStage
    MS Data Quality Services
    Learn More
    Overview
    IBM QualityStage is a foundational component for your data quality and information governance initiatives. It helps you create and maintain consistent views of key entities including customers, vendors, locations and products. This lets you investigate, cleanse and manage your data.

    SQL Server Data Quality Services (DQS) is a knowledge-driven data quality product. DQS enables you to build a knowledge base and use it to perform a variety of critical data quality tasks, including correction, enrichment, standardization, and de-duplication of your data.

    Sample Customers
    PRO BTP, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Sicoob, NICE Systems, Integra LifeSciences Corp.
    Information Not Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Quality
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, SAP, Talend and others in Data Quality. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM QualityStage is ranked 18th in Data Quality while Microsoft Data Quality Services is ranked 14th in Data Quality with 1 review. IBM QualityStage is rated 9.0, while Microsoft Data Quality Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM QualityStage writes "Has allowed my teams of developers to transfer data quickly and easily from SQL databases into Oracle databases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Data Quality Services writes " Usefulness of data enrichment features, which can help improve data quality and accuracy". IBM QualityStage is most compared with IBM Infosphere Information Analyzer, whereas Microsoft Data Quality Services is most compared with Informatica Data Quality.

    See our list of best Data Quality vendors.

    We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.