We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare IBM SAN48B-5 vs. IBM SAN768B

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM SAN48B-5 Logo
114 views|78 comparisons
IBM SAN768B Logo
19 views|7 comparisons
Ranking
7th
out of 14 in Enterprise SAN
Views
114
Comparisons
78
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
11th
out of 14 in Enterprise SAN
Views
19
Comparisons
7
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
SAN48B-5
SAN768B
Learn More
Overview
The IBM System Storage SAN48B-5 switch is designed to meet the demands of hyper-scale private or hybrid cloud storage environments by delivering Gen 5 Fibre Channel technology and capabilities with 16 Gbps performance that support highly virtualized environments. To enable greater flexibility and investment protection, SAN48B-5 is configurable up to 48 ports and supports speeds up to 16 Gbps in a designed 1U package.
IBM System Storage SAN768B fabric backbones is a Fibre Channel switching infrastructure offerings that provide the foundation for reliable, scalable, high-performance storage. The System Storage SAN b-type family switch leverages Gen 5 Fibre Channel and Fabric Vision technology to deliver long-term solutions for mission-critical applications that require secure, high-performance, low-latency storage networks.
Offer
Learn more about IBM SAN48B-5
Learn more about IBM SAN768B
Sample Customers
CERN, Bigcommerce, Connect2Cloud, Genius Inside, Performance Buildings AG
Einstein Healthcare, Hansgrohe SE, Yaap Digital Services

IBM SAN48B-5 is ranked 7th in Enterprise SAN while IBM SAN768B is ranked 11th in Enterprise SAN. IBM SAN48B-5 is rated 0.0, while IBM SAN768B is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM SAN48B-5 is most compared with , whereas IBM SAN768B is most compared with .

See our list of best Enterprise SAN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise SAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.