Compare IBM SAN48B-5 vs. IBM SAN768B

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM SAN48B-5 Logo
189 views|138 comparisons
IBM SAN768B Logo
47 views|28 comparisons
Ranking
6th
out of 14 in Enterprise SAN
Views
189
Comparisons
138
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
10th
out of 14 in Enterprise SAN
Views
47
Comparisons
28
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 100% of the time.
Also Known As
SAN48B-5SAN768B
Learn
IBM
IBM
Overview
The IBM System Storage SAN48B-5 switch is designed to meet the demands of hyper-scale private or hybrid cloud storage environments by delivering Gen 5 Fibre Channel technology and capabilities with 16 Gbps performance that support highly virtualized environments. To enable greater flexibility and investment protection, SAN48B-5 is configurable up to 48 ports and supports speeds up to 16 Gbps in a designed 1U package.IBM System Storage SAN768B fabric backbones is a Fibre Channel switching infrastructure offerings that provide the foundation for reliable, scalable, high-performance storage. The System Storage SAN b-type family switch leverages Gen 5 Fibre Channel and Fabric Vision technology to deliver long-term solutions for mission-critical applications that require secure, high-performance, low-latency storage networks.
Offer
Learn more about IBM SAN48B-5
Learn more about IBM SAN768B
Sample Customers
CERN, Bigcommerce, Connect2Cloud, Genius Inside, Performance Buildings AGEinstein Healthcare, Hansgrohe SE, Yaap Digital Services
IBM SAN48B-5 is ranked 6th in Enterprise SAN while IBM SAN768B is ranked 10th in Enterprise SAN. IBM SAN48B-5 is rated 0.0, while IBM SAN768B is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM SAN48B-5 is most compared with IBM SAN384B, whereas IBM SAN768B is most compared with .

See our list of best Enterprise SAN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise SAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.