IBM SAN768B vs Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Ranking
14th
out of 15 in Enterprise SAN
Views
18
Comparisons
11
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
10th
out of 15 in Enterprise SAN
Views
28
Comparisons
23
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
SAN768B
Learn More
Overview
IBM System Storage SAN768B fabric backbones is a Fibre Channel switching infrastructure offerings that provide the foundation for reliable, scalable, high-performance storage. The System Storage SAN b-type family switch leverages Gen 5 Fibre Channel and Fabric Vision technology to deliver long-term solutions for mission-critical applications that require secure, high-performance, low-latency storage networks.

The Oracle FS1-2 flash storage system, Oracle’s premier preferred SAN storage solution, delivers enterprise-grade storage capabilities that are optimized for flash media and coengineered with Oracle software. Using the Quality of Service Plus (QoS Plus) feature, the Oracle FS1-2 flash storage system places data across flash and disk storage to maximize performance, efficiency, and cost based on usage profiles and business priorities. The Oracle FS1-2 flash storage system takes application-engineered storage to a new level by providing out-of-the-box tuned storage provisioning profiles for Oracle Database and key applications, including Microsoft SharePoint and Exchange, and VMware support including VAAI. With the Oracle FS1-2 flash storage system, you can consolidate storage while achieving predictable performance for multiple diverse workloads in enterprise computing or multitenant environments.

Sample Customers
Einstein Healthcare, Hansgrohe SE, Yaap Digital Services
Enterprise Strategy Group, Groupe AGRICA, Keolis, Dragon Slayer Consultant

IBM SAN768B is ranked 14th in Enterprise SAN while Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System is ranked 10th in Enterprise SAN. IBM SAN768B is rated 0.0, while Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System writes "Has a fantastic feature-set and works well with workflow solutions". IBM SAN768B is most compared with , whereas Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System is most compared with Dell Unity XT.

See our list of best Enterprise SAN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise SAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.