We performed a comparison between IBM Security Guardium Data Protection and Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Imperva, Oracle and others in Database Security."It provides a comprehensive security for databases, both on-prem and on the cloud. Among the advanced features we use automatic backups, DR."
"The solution has definitely saved us time, because if you want to monitor this kind of vast environment of different products, it's going to take a lot of time. Let's say one database server has 100 database instances running on it; I don't need to install 100 data instances, I just need to install on the one database server and that will cover all of my instances on that particular database."
"We use IBM Guardium to support security initiatives and combine policies within the organization."
"It has automated a bunch of manual tasks, giving us insights into activities that we would not otherwise be able to capture."
"The product has proven to be flexible"
"Being an IBM product it really offers security integration capabilities and robust features. Over the years, it has satisfactory met the requirements of our customers which makes it a very reliable and versatile solution."
"Gathering the data works very well. "
"Its ability to find data."
"This solution delivers the value that it is supposed to deliver."
"We have had some issues with patches breaking things unexpectedly in our environments."
"The ability for Central Managers to talk to one another could be improved. I have 26 Central Managers and 26 silos which are independent."
"The deployment is complex and requires expertise to deploy."
"The solution lacks control over database security."
"Needs nore cloud support."
"The analysis part of this product could be improved. It's a very comprehensive product, so the features it has complement customer requirements. But I would like to see more emphasis on analytics, and it would be great if they added machine learning. They already have analysis insights, but a comprehensive analytical feature that's already incorporated into the solution would be very helpful."
"Guardium's storage capabilities could use some improvement. I'd also like to have some better integration using digital technology or a connector."
"There are features like end-to-end and S-TAP mapping, and the ability to install policies for your configuration builder. They're not there, but we'd like to see them in the next version."
"There are not a lot of templates available to use, so we had to start many things from scratch."
More IBM Security Guardium Data Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is ranked 1st in Database Security with 70 reviews while Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting is ranked 14th in Data Masking. IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is rated 8.2, while Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Security Guardium Data Protection writes "Provides visibility, has a single console that shows all information, and collector-aggregator capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting writes "Stable with good support but the single-sign on could be improved". IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is most compared with Imperva SecureSphere Database Security, Oracle Audit Vault, Oracle Advanced Security, DataSunrise Database Security and Voltage SecureData Enterprise, whereas Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting is most compared with Oracle Advanced Security.
We monitor all Database Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
