We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and Mezmo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We find predictive analysis capabilities valuable."
"Due to the skills shortage, we are able to use it from the standpoint of bringing in a lower level employee or a person who may not have security knowledge."
"The most valuable feature is the machine learning module."
"The solution is relatively easy to use."
"The most valuable features are all the implementations, the plug-ins, and the User Behavior Analytics (UBA)."
"I like that it's easy to use and the performance is good."
"We've found the technical support to be very good."
"It's quite scalable. We have upgraded some solutions from 1000 APS up to 3500 APS to 5000 APS. It's a good solution, they have no scalability issues."
"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."
"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."
"The solution should enhance its capabilities of UEBA and AI/ML tech modeling."
"I need a solution which will send alerts in the event of any behavior."
"I would like the rule creation interface to be much more user-friendly in the next release."
"IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson could be more user-friendly. You need some skills and understanding of what you're looking at, especially if you're going to draw down specific information."
"The AI engine could be smarter."
"The solution should include remote action capabilities."
"Certain updates—especially when using Azure—don't apply directly. Our engineering team must invest additional effort to implement these updates. However, the tool's cloud-based version poses no issues. However, upgrading the product can sometimes be challenging for on-premises instances."
"We have had problems with networking."
"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."
"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."
Earn 20 points
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews while Mezmo is ranked 51st in Log Management. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while Mezmo is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mezmo writes "Has vastly increased our ability to reach SLA targets consistently". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas Mezmo is most compared with Datadog and Cribl Stream. See our IBM Security QRadar vs. Mezmo report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.