Compare IBM solidDB vs. Oracle Database In-Memory
Use IBM solidDB? Share your opinion.
 | Martin Klier Senior Database Consultant at Performing Databases |
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases. Updated: June 2021.
510,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
510,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Top Answer: The application development is very user-friendly.
Top Answer: The product is quite expensive. Organizations should be prepared for a rather high price tag. Our clients may end up moving to an open-source option to lower costs.
Top Answer: The pricing could be improved. It would ideal if it was more reasonable. The design isn't that great. It's kind-of buggy and doesn't seem to cater to the Korean market. There seems to be issues… more »
Views
387
Comparisons
194
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
2,482
Comparisons
1,977
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
439
Rating
8.3
Compared 46% of the time.
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
solidDB
IBM solidDB is a relational database server that combines the high performance of in-memory tables with the nearly unlimited capacity of disk-based tables.
Pure in-memory databases are fast, but strictly limited by the size of memory. Pure disk-based databases allow nearly unlimited amounts of storage, but their performance is dominated by disk access. Even if the computer has enough memory to store the entire database in memory buffers, database servers that are designed for disk-based tables can be slow because the data structures that are optimal for disk-based tables are far from being optimal for in-memory tables. The solidDB solution is to provide a single hybrid database server that contains two optimized engines inside it:
- The main-memory engine (MME) is optimized for in-memory access.
- The disk-based engine (DBE) is optimized for disk-based access.
Both engines coexist inside the same server process, and a single SQL statement can access data from both engines.
Oracle Database In-Memory transparently accelerates analytics by orders of magnitude while simultaneously speeding up mixed-workload OLTP. With Oracle Database In-Memory, users get immediate answers to business questions that previously took hours.
Oracle Database In-Memory delivers leading-edge in-memory performance without the need to restrict functionality, or accept compromises, complexity and risk. Deploying Oracle Database In-Memory with any existing Oracle Database compatible application is as easy as flipping a switch - no application changes are required. Oracle Database In-Memory is fully integrated with the Oracle Database’s renowned scale-up, scale-out, storage tiering, availability, and security technologies making it the most industrialstrength offering on the market.
The ability to easily perform real-time data analysis together with real-time transaction processing on all existing applications enables organizations to transform into Real-Time Enterprises that quickly make data-driven decisions, respond instantly to customer demands, and continuously optimize all key processes.
For more information on Oracle Database In-Memory, visit Oracle.com
Learn more about IBM solidDB
Learn more about Oracle Database In-Memory
Iskratel
Shanghai Customs
No Data Available
Financial Services Firm11%
Local Government11%
Retailer11%
Insurance Company11%
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider25%
Financial Services Firm10%
Government5%
No Data Available
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise57%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases. Updated: June 2021.
510,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM solidDB is ranked 30th in Relational Databases while Oracle Database In-Memory is ranked 9th in Relational Databases with 6 reviews. IBM solidDB is rated 0.0, while Oracle Database In-Memory is rated 8.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database In-Memory writes "Easy to deploy and has good performance". IBM solidDB is most compared with SQL Server, MySQL and IBM Db2 Database, whereas Oracle Database In-Memory is most compared with SAP HANA, SQL Server, Progress OpenEdge RDBMS, MariaDB and Exasol.
See our list of best Relational Databases vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.