Compare IBM Spectrum Computing vs. Juniper AppFormix

IBM Spectrum Computing is ranked 21st in Cloud Management with 3 reviews while Juniper AppFormix is ranked 18th in Cloud Management with 1 review. IBM Spectrum Computing is rated 7.0, while Juniper AppFormix is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM Spectrum Computing writes "Provides stable backup for our databases and has good technical support ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper AppFormix writes "Good scalability for big networks and has a straightforward deployment". IBM Spectrum Computing is most compared with Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, whereas Juniper AppFormix is most compared with Cisco CloudCenter, VMware vRealize Automation (vRA) and Turbonomic.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Turbonomic, Cisco and others in Cloud Management. Updated: July 2020.
430,905 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
We are satisfied with the technical support, we have no issues.The scalability of the solution is good.This solution is working for both VTL and tape.

More IBM Spectrum Computing Pros »

The solution's technical support is good.

More Juniper AppFormix Pros »

Cons
SMB storage and HPC is not compatible and it should be supported by IBM Spectrum Computing.The initial setup is not so complex. However, the day-to-day administration is complex and there are far too many manual intervention requirements.This solution is no longer managing tapes correctly.

More IBM Spectrum Computing Cons »

This solution has a yearly licensing. In my country, it's really expensive.

More Juniper AppFormix Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
This solution is expensive.

More IBM Spectrum Computing Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
430,905 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
21st
out of 73 in Cloud Management
Views
331
Comparisons
179
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
289
Avg. Rating
7.0
18th
out of 73 in Cloud Management
Views
491
Comparisons
331
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
288
Avg. Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 26% of the time.
Also Known As
IBM Platform Computing
Learn
IBM
Juniper
Overview

IBM Spectrum Computing uses intelligent workload and policy-driven resource management to optimize resources across the data center, on premises and in the cloud. Now up to 150X faster and scalable to over 160,000 cores, IBM provides you with the latest advances in software-defined infrastructure to help you unleash the power of your distributed mission-critical high performance computing (HPC), analytics and big data applications as well as a new generation open source frameworks such as Hadoop and Spark.

AppFormix is an optimization and management software platform for public, private and hybrid clouds. This intent-driven software manages automated operations, visibility, and reporting in cloud and Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) use cases for Kubernetes and OpenStack, as well as Amazon Web Services. It features machine learning-based policy and smart monitors, application and software-defined infrastructure analytics, alarms, and chargeback accounting.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Spectrum Computing
Learn more about Juniper AppFormix
Sample Customers
London South Bank University, Transvalor, Infiniti Red Bull Racing, GenomicRackspace, PlusServer
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Turbonomic, Cisco and others in Cloud Management. Updated: July 2020.
430,905 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.