Compare IBM Watson Content Hub vs. TerminalFour Site Manager
IBM Watson Content Hub is ranked 13th in Web Content Management while TerminalFour Site Manager is ranked 25th in Web Content Management. IBM Watson Content Hub is rated 0, while TerminalFour Site Manager is rated 0. On the other hand, IBM Watson Content Hub is most compared with Drupal, WordPress and SharePoint, whereas TerminalFour Site Manager is most compared with Wordpress.com VIP, Drupal and WordPress.
Ranking  | |
Views 855 Comparisons 717 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Avg. Rating N/A | Views 209 Comparisons 162 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Avg. Rating N/A |
 Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Joomla and others in Web Content Management. Updated: December 2019. 391,932 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 30% of the time.  Compared 23% of the time.  Compared 14% of the time. | Compared 40% of the time. Compared 31% of the time. Compared 29% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| IBM Web Content Manager, Watson Content Hub | Site Manager |
Learn | |
| IBM | TerminalFour |
Overview | |
| The Watson Content Hub gives business owners the power to create iconic, robust and consistent brand experiences using cloud-based, cognitive content management capabilities. Marketing and merchandising professionals can quickly select content to create relevant offers delivered across multiple channels, such as mobile, web-based or email, including those delivered by IBM Campaign Automation and IBM Digital Commerce. | TERMINALFOUR Site Manager includes a wide range of Intranet, Social Media and Web 2.0 modules at no extra cost: Blogging, Forms, Microsites, Discussions, Commenting, Polls, GIS/Mapping, Videos, Social Tagging and Personalised Portals. |
Offer | |
Learn more about IBM Watson Content Hub | Learn more about TerminalFour Site Manager |
Sample Customers | |
| Factor-y S.r.l., Cochlear Limited, Amadori Group, Superior Group, Department of Justice | University Administration ,Loyola,swinburne University ,Rhodes University ,rmit University,University college dublin,University of florida |
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Joomla and others in Web Content Management. Updated: December 2019.
391,932 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also IBM Watson Content Hub Reviews, TerminalFour Site Manager Reviews, and our list of Best Web Content Management Companies.
We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.