Ranking | |
Views 375 Comparisons 302 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 189 Comparisons 146 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Liferay, Oracle and others in Web Content Management. Updated: January 2021. 457,459 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Popular Comparisons | |
![]() Compared 54% of the time. ![]() Compared 46% of the time. | ![]() Compared 100% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
IBM Web Content Manager, Watson Content Hub | Site Manager |
Learn | |
IBM | TerminalFour |
Overview | |
The Watson Content Hub gives business owners the power to create iconic, robust and consistent brand experiences using cloud-based, cognitive content management capabilities. Marketing and merchandising professionals can quickly select content to create relevant offers delivered across multiple channels, such as mobile, web-based or email, including those delivered by IBM Campaign Automation and IBM Digital Commerce. | TERMINALFOUR Site Manager includes a wide range of Intranet, Social Media and Web 2.0 modules at no extra cost: Blogging, Forms, Microsites, Discussions, Commenting, Polls, GIS/Mapping, Videos, Social Tagging and Personalised Portals. |
Offer | |
Learn more about IBM Watson Content Hub | Learn more about TerminalFour Site Manager |
Sample Customers | |
Factor-y S.r.l., Cochlear Limited, Amadori Group, Superior Group, Department of Justice | University Administration ,Loyola,swinburne University ,Rhodes University ,rmit University,University college dublin,University of florida |
IBM Watson Content Hub is ranked 20th in Web Content Management while TerminalFour Site Manager is ranked 27th in Web Content Management. IBM Watson Content Hub is rated 0.0, while TerminalFour Site Manager is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM Watson Content Hub is most compared with Drupal and WordPress, whereas TerminalFour Site Manager is most compared with WordPress.
See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.