Ilex Sign&go vs PingFederate comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ilex Logo
260 views|217 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Ping Identity Logo
2,921 views|2,475 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ilex Sign&go and PingFederate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO).
To learn more, read our detailed Single Sign-On (SSO) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The on-premises deployment meets restrictions and the end-user is able to control all the configuration in their own IT environment."

More Ilex Sign&go Pros →

"PingFederate is very flexible. We can do many customizations, and it also provides an SDK to tailor it to our specific requirements. There are also numerous plugins available. I've worked with tools like ForgeRock and Okta, but I find PingFederate to be the most customizable.""PingFederate gives you granular control over the settings. There are many options for fine-tuning policies.""It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.""The most valuable feature is multifactor authentication."

More PingFederate Pros →

Cons
"There is no software as a service or PaaS (Platform as a Service) offering from Ilex. The only option is on-premises integration."

More Ilex Sign&go Cons →

"Notifications and monitoring are two areas with shortcomings in the solution that need improvement.""PingFederate's UI could be streamlined. They have recently made several improvements, but it's still too complex. It's a common complaint. The configuration should be simplified because the learning curve is too steep.""It requires some expertise to set up and manage.""Currently, the main integration is SAML-based, but other integration methodologies need to be supported."

More PingFederate Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."
  • More PingFederate Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:Notifications and monitoring are two areas with shortcomings in the solution that need improvement.
    Top Answer:In my company, we use PingFederate for federated connections and some ADC connections to arrange for single sign-on across our infrastructure and customers.
    Ranking
    24th
    Views
    260
    Comparisons
    217
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    10th
    Views
    2,921
    Comparisons
    2,475
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    404
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Sign&go
    Learn More
    Ping Identity
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Sign&go is a modular global SSO solution from llex International which addresses the security and traceability issues. It offers Strong authentication, Web Access Management, Mobile Access Management, Identity Federation functionalities through common architecture and administration.

    PingFederate is an enterprise federation server that enables user authentication and single sign-on. It serves as a global authentication authority that allows employees, customers and partners to securely access all the applications they need from any device. PingFederate easily integrates with applications across the enterprise, third-party authentication sources, diverse user directories and existing IAM systems, all while supporting current and past versions of identity standards like OAuth, OpenID Connect, SAML and WS-Federation. And it can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud, so you can support today’s needs and future-proof your business for tomorrow’s requirements.

    Sample Customers
    High Council of French Notaries, Leroy Merlin, IFP School, CANAL+ Group, Soci_t_ G_n_rale, Saint-ótienne University Hospital
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Construction Company13%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Healthcare Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm28%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Educational Organization10%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise66%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Single Sign-On (SSO)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Ilex Sign&go is ranked 24th in Single Sign-On (SSO) while PingFederate is ranked 10th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 4 reviews. Ilex Sign&go is rated 8.0, while PingFederate is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ilex Sign&go writes "Strong single sign on security comes packaged with simplicity in this on-premises-only solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PingFederate writes " A highly stable tool offering extremely helpful technical support to its users". Ilex Sign&go is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity and Auth0, whereas PingFederate is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Symantec Siteminder, PingID, Microsoft Active Directory and CyberArk Identity.

    See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

    We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.