Ilex Sign&go vs Red Hat Single Sign On comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ilex Logo
260 views|217 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Red Hat Logo
1,424 views|1,040 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ilex Sign&go and Red Hat Single Sign On based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO).
To learn more, read our detailed Single Sign-On (SSO) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The on-premises deployment meets restrictions and the end-user is able to control all the configuration in their own IT environment."

More Ilex Sign&go Pros →

"Red Hat SSO integrates well with our other solutions. Using OIDC protocols and ITL integration, employees can authenticate with Red Hat SSO and access our microservices.""The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value.""Red Hat SSO has a lot of very concise, well laid out documentation, which is available in the free edition as well.""Good support for single sign-on protocols.""It is very easy to scale and use as you want."

More Red Hat Single Sign On Pros →

Cons
"There is no software as a service or PaaS (Platform as a Service) offering from Ilex. The only option is on-premises integration."

More Ilex Sign&go Cons →

"Security could be improved.""They could provide more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses, e.g., if somebody is trying to break into the system. Some other products have these detection mechanisms in case someone is trying to hack into the system or find out a user's passwords.""The product’s technical support services could be better.""Red Hat SSO's architecture could be updated."

More Red Hat Single Sign On Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is a low cost product. This product can be used by non-profit organizations or universities, when they don't want to invest a lot of money."
  • "If you want support, that is when you use the paid version. There are different support categories that you can pay for, which provide different support levels. E.g., there is a quick response if you pay a higher amount, where the response time is within a few hours."
  • "The license is around $8000 USD."
  • "Red Hat Single Sign On is expensive."
  • More Red Hat Single Sign On Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value.
    Top Answer:Red Hat Single Sign On is expensive. There are similar local solutions available at low-cost.
    Top Answer:The product’s technical support services could be better. Additionally, they should add complimentary software security versions.
    Ranking
    24th
    Views
    260
    Comparisons
    217
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    11th
    Views
    1,424
    Comparisons
    1,040
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    227
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Sign&go
    Red Hat Single Sign-On, Red Hat SSO, RH SSO, RH-SSO
    Learn More
    Overview

    Sign&go is a modular global SSO solution from llex International which addresses the security and traceability issues. It offers Strong authentication, Web Access Management, Mobile Access Management, Identity Federation functionalities through common architecture and administration.

    Red Hat is the world’s leading provider of enterprise open source solutions, using a community-powered approach to deliver high-performing Linux, cloud, container, and Kubernetes technologies.

    Sample Customers
    High Council of French Notaries, Leroy Merlin, IFP School, CANAL+ Group, Soci_t_ G_n_rale, Saint-ótienne University Hospital
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Construction Company13%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Healthcare Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Government13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise66%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Single Sign-On (SSO)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Ilex Sign&go is ranked 24th in Single Sign-On (SSO) while Red Hat Single Sign On is ranked 11th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 4 reviews. Ilex Sign&go is rated 8.0, while Red Hat Single Sign On is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Ilex Sign&go writes "Strong single sign on security comes packaged with simplicity in this on-premises-only solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Single Sign On writes "It is very easy to scale and use as you want, but there could be more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses". Ilex Sign&go is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity and Auth0, whereas Red Hat Single Sign On is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Auth0, Okta Workforce Identity, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and PingFederate.

    See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

    We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.