We performed a comparison between Informatica Address Verification and SQL Power Data Quality based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, SAP, Talend and others in Data Quality."The scalability is very high."
"The solution is able to integrate with many systems and other products."
"The Nomo, select form, and so on are the most valuable features."
"It is a scalable solution. We have over 1,000 SQL Power Data Quality users in our organization."
"The only thing that I can imagine that might be improved is how the available transactions verify addresses used. These transactions have a valid end date and must be used within the agreed timeframe."
"The only area of improvement that we've come across within the solution was the portfolio roadmap creation. There's a bit of limitation there, but otherwise, the tool itself is very good."
"The normalization factor should be improved so that it is better scaled. It should be more user-friendly."
"Downtime issues should be improved."
Earn 20 points
Informatica Address Verification is ranked 12th in Data Quality while SQL Power Data Quality is ranked 6th in Data Scrubbing Software with 4 reviews. Informatica Address Verification is rated 8.4, while SQL Power Data Quality is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Informatica Address Verification writes "Scalable, ensures proper data governance, and is easy to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SQL Power Data Quality writes "Is easy to deploy and is stable and scalable". Informatica Address Verification is most compared with Trillium TS Quality, Melissa Data Quality, Ataccama DQ Analyzer, Posidex Technologies Data Quality and SAP Data Quality Management, whereas SQL Power Data Quality is most compared with Alteryx.
We monitor all Data Quality reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.