Intel MFSYS25 vs SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Intel Logo
52 views|30 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
views| comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Intel MFSYS25 and SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
21st
out of 22 in Blade Servers
Views
52
Comparisons
30
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Blade Servers
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
MFSYS25
Rackable Systems
Learn More
Overview

This Intel Modular Server System MFSYS25/MFSYS35 platform supports up to six compute modules, up to fourteen hot-swap 2.5-inch SAS hard disk drives in the Intel Modular Server System MFSYS25, or up to six hot-swap 3.5-inch SAS/SATA hard disk drives in the Intel Modular Server System MFSYS35, an integrated server management module, redundant Ethernet switches, and redundant storage controllers. The server ships configured for rack mounting, but may be mounted in a pedestal configuration. 

SGI Rackable standard-depth, rackmount servers and clusters deliver top value and performance, based on the winning combination of the latest Intel processor architectures and SGI expertise in designing and delivering the most advanced performance computing systems available. Rackable servers support up to 1.5TB of memory per node in an ultra-dense architecture with up to 88 cores per 1U. Add to this support for FDR and EDR InfiniBand, 22-core processors and DDR4 memory, and you have some of the most powerful cluster solutions available.

Sample Customers
Eisenhower & Carlson, PLLC
DownUnder GeoSolutions (DUG), Tagged
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Intel MFSYS25 is ranked 21st in Blade Servers while SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Blade Servers. Intel MFSYS25 is rated 6.0, while SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Intel MFSYS25 writes " We're able to set-up multiple VLANs in it". On the other hand, Intel MFSYS25 is most compared with , whereas SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.