Ipanema IpIengine vs Noction IRP comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ipanema Technologies Logo
72 views|31 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Noction Logo
207 views|92 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ipanema IpIengine and Noction IRP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization.
To learn more, read our detailed WAN Optimization Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
11th
out of 15 in WAN Optimization
Views
72
Comparisons
31
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
8th
out of 15 in WAN Optimization
Views
207
Comparisons
92
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
WAN Optimization
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
IpIengine
Learn More
Ipanema Technologies
Video Not Available
Overview

The Ipanema Autonomic Networking System (ANS) uses both software and hardware components. The fully featured hardware components are called ip|engines. These devices are installed within the customer VPN at edge locations, typically between a CPE router and the LAN. Requiring no specific local configuration except an IP address, an ip|engine is a self-managed and cooperative device that operates under the control of the ANS central management software, called SALSA. Each ip|engine acts as a local point of control within ANS. ip|engines work collectively in real-time to discover the applications and measure the network's performance and usage ip|engine. As part of ANS, the ip|engines cooperate and tune themselves automatically to the dynamic nature of the application traffic, globally enforcing the Application SLAs. They take into account meshed flows, different types of congestion, application competition for resources and so on. The ip|engines adapt to longer term changes within the business, such as a change in the distribution of users across sites, a newly deployed application or a new site, as well as the evolution of infrastructure and services into the cloud.

Noction Intelligent Routing Platform is designed to improve the performance and reduce operational costs of a multi-homed BGP network. By adding intelligence to internet routing decisions, Noction IRP leverages a company’s existing internet connectivity to deliver substantial network performance improvements.

Sample Customers
Valeo, KBC, Henkel, Bouygues Telecom, Gemalto, VDABês, Globus, EADS, faurecia, Fiat, Renault Nissan, Safran, Valeo, Volvo, Aviva, Visa, L'Oreal, Hasbro, Moet & Chandon Champagne
Hivelocity, Wiredtree, Datapipe, ATE, UK2 Group, Steadfast, WebNX, TirePoint, Bandwidth.com, TETN, DQE Communications, OFFISTE
Buyer's Guide
WAN Optimization
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Ipanema IpIengine is ranked 11th in WAN Optimization while Noction IRP is ranked 8th in WAN Optimization. Ipanema IpIengine is rated 8.0, while Noction IRP is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Ipanema IpIengine writes "We like the Dynamic WAN selection and Dynamic QoS. It's important to select the right device at the start". On the other hand, Ipanema IpIengine is most compared with , whereas Noction IRP is most compared with Steelhead.

See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.

We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.