We performed a comparison between Ivanti Neurons for Patch Intelligence and Microsoft Configuration Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCLTech, Kaseya and others in Patch Management."The Ivanti Neurons for Patch Intelligence's most valuable feature is simplicity. When deployed in our environment, the standout aspect is the ease of installation across different offices. For example, in a location with 150 users, we only need to install the agent on one machine. From there, it scans the entire network, identifying components on computers, laptops, desktops, and more. We can view the results and easily push updates."
"Microsoft Configuration Manager helps with patch management."
"I like Mircosoft's technical support. Microsoft has a few updates, like some of the critical KBs. They are published within the interval time, and in case of an escalation on the client missions, we will raise a ticket with the Microsoft team. They will create a hotfix or a critical update. They will chat with us, and that is one thing I like about Microsoft. Whenever any issues occur at my organization, they will help you out soon as possible within the SLA."
"The technical support is good."
"It saves a lot of money when you can install things automatically and they are installed the exact same way on every computer."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its ability to deploy patches to nearly all applications."
"Valuable features include configurations enforcement, compliance data gathering, and deployment of a standardized OS."
"With the right administrator, application deployment can do wonders."
"One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined process has significantly improved our software distribution workflows."
"Ivanti Neurons for Patch Intelligence needs to improve reporting."
"The tool's deployment is difficult. Microsoft needs to improve documentation with videos."
"The solution should be more compatible with different versions of Linux."
"The configuration of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager could be improved, it is a bit complicated."
"The tool's deployment is complex and depends on the architecture you want to implement."
"SCCM can improve on third-party application support."
"The reports are too busy. They could be simpler. I'm a technician, so I don't care how pretty the reports look. They should be easy to read. I'm designing this for production folks. They need to read the reports quickly when they're patching in the middle of the night."
"In terms of scalability, I believe there's room for improvement. While SCCM is capable of handling our current needs effectively, scalability could be enhanced to accommodate future growth and larger deployments."
"Cloud-based improvements need to be better managed."
More Ivanti Neurons for Patch Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ivanti Neurons for Patch Intelligence is ranked 20th in Patch Management with 1 review while Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 1st in Patch Management with 78 reviews. Ivanti Neurons for Patch Intelligence is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Intelligence writes "Helps to do monthly updates for Microsoft and other third-party products ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". Ivanti Neurons for Patch Intelligence is most compared with Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager, whereas Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Intune, BigFix and Tanium.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
