Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune vs Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune and Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Patch Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune vs. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
DddGgggg
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features are device management and support for upgrading applications.""We can set a maintenance window and push the patch.""The solution is a good product and I have heard that the interface is more friendly than that of Windows.""Both in terms of features and operations, this is a good solution.""I have found the interface and ease of use valuable features. Additionally, it is very easy to patch VMs and other systems, such a Linux. We are able to do patches even without the internet manually.""We use the solution for security patching of Windows devices.""Ivanti Patch's most valuable features are the patch module and the package distribution.""I like the product's Peer to Peer patching feature."

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Pros →

"The tool is a stable product.""Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, and Mac helps to ensure that everything is up to date.""The solution is easy to implement.""The website development section is the most valuable feature of the solution."

More Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac Pros →

Cons
"There are times when there is an update that causes some issues. These issues should be sorted out before the release.""Customers sometimes ask about non-existent features, and we pass these requests on to Ivanti.""It's a difficult configuration because you need to install many servers in a location, and you have to install the primary server in the main location.""Ivanti Patch could be improved with better integration with other cloud solutions.""The reports have to show the compliance level of the patching, which Ivanti does not provide.""Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune needs to improve stability. We had issues with patching.""I would like to have better support for the application.""I tried to be a partner of Ivanti and, from this vantage point, the quotes are, perhaps, a bit high."

More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Cons →

"The better way to improve the solution is by working on an area where it lacks, which includes the migration part.""The tool needs to improve its visual system.""The solution can be quite expensive, compared to other options on the market."

More Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."
  • "The solution is affordable."
  • "While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."
  • "The solution is expensive compared to other products."
  • "The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."
  • More Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The solution is open-source, so we do not need any licensing."
  • More Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We use the solution for security patching of Windows devices.
    Top Answer:There are some issues in the on-premises infrastructure of the clients.
    Top Answer:I provide the customer with the steps to follow, and they follow their scheduling and procedures. I also provide the information to the people involved in the pilot. My role is solely to provide a… more »
    Top Answer:Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, and Mac helps to ensure that everything is up to date.
    Top Answer:The solution is not expensive. It is cheaper than other solutions. The solution is open-source, so we do not need any licensing.
    Top Answer:The better way to improve the solution is by working on an area where it lacks, which includes the migration part. Currently, on Amazon AWS, we have hosted all the websites. It is fine to migrate from… more »
    Ranking
    8th
    out of 50 in Patch Management
    Views
    2,988
    Comparisons
    1,877
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    323
    Rating
    8.0
    15th
    out of 50 in Patch Management
    Views
    332
    Comparisons
    163
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    274
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Ivanti Patch for Windows, Patch for Windows, Shavlik Patch for Windows
    HEAT Patch, PatchLink
    Learn More
    Overview

    Better protect against threats that stem from vulnerabilities in third-party applications.

    Improve protection against threats that stem from vulnerabilities in third-party applications by extending Intune with risk-based third-party patch publishing – without any additional infrastructure.

    Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac, powered by Heat, swiftly detects vulnerabilities in today’s environment, from workstation to data center. And it deploys expertly pretested patches automatically, helping organizations to patch with more efficiency and efficacy.

    Sample Customers
    Presbyterian Church
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Government12%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Retailer11%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise50%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise53%
    Buyer's Guide
    Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune vs. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune vs. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is ranked 8th in Patch Management with 10 reviews while Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac is ranked 15th in Patch Management with 4 reviews. Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is rated 8.0, while Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune writes "Allows us to set maintenance windows and deliver patches". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac writes "With good website development capabilities, the solution also provides exceptional stability". Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services, Quest KACE Systems Management, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and BigFix, whereas Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac is most compared with Ivanti Security Controls. See our Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune vs. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac report.

    See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

    We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.