• Home
  • Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs. Seeker

Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Seeker comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Keysight Technologies Logo

Ixia BreakingPoint VE

187 views|148 comparisons
Synopsys Logo

Seeker

Read 1 Seeker review
758 views|558 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Testing (AST)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ixia BreakingPoint VE and Seeker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Testing (AST) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Ixia BreakingPoint VE?
San K
More effective than dynamic scanners, but is missing useful learning capabilities
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The licensing for Seeker is user-based and for 50 users I believe it costs about $70,000 per year."

    • More Seeker Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about Seeker?
    Top Answer:A significant advantage of Seeker is that it is an interactive scanner, and we have found it to be much more effective in reducing the amount of false positives than dynamic scanners such as AppScan… more »
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seeker?
    Top Answer:The licensing for Seeker is user-based and for 50 users I believe it costs about $70,000 per year.
    What needs improvement with Seeker?
    Top Answer:One area that Seeker can improve is to make it more customizable. All security scanning tools have a defined set of rules that are based on certain criteria which they will use to detect issues… more »
    Ranking
    36th
    out of 67 in Application Security Testing (AST)
    Views
    187
    Comparisons
    148
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    24th
    out of 67 in Application Security Testing (AST)
    Views
    758
    Comparisons
    558
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    1,632
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Keysight Technologies
    Synopsys
    Overview

    Ixia’s BreakingPoint virtual edition (VE) provides scalable real-world application and threat simulation in a deployment model that fits IT budgets by leveraging virtualization and industry-standard hardware platforms.

    • Seamless transition between hardware and virtual platforms enables easy translation of functional and performace testing in physical or virtual environments
    • Common licensing server shared among BreakingPoint VE, IxLoad VE, and IxNetwork VE
    • BreakingPoint supports all major Hypervisors allowing deployment in a wide variety of VM enviroments
    • Subscription based licensing model comes an all-inclusive license that reduces startup cost
    • Bi-monthly Application and Threat Intelligence (ATI) subscription updates ensure you are current with the latest applications and threats
    Seeker®, interactive application security testing (IAST) solution, gives you unparalleled visibility into your modern web, cloud based and microservices based app security posture. It automatically verifies, prioritizes and reports on critical vulnerabilities in real time. It identifies vulnerability trends against compliance standards (e.g., OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS, GDPR, CAPEC, and CWE/SANS Top 25). Seeker enables security teams to identify and track sensitive data to ensure that it is handled securely and not stored in log files or databases with weak or no encryption. Seeker’s seamless integration into CI/CD workflows enables fast interactive application security testing at DevOps speed.
    Sample Customers
    Corsa Technology
    El Al Airlines and Société Française du Radiotelephone
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Insurance Company5%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Testing (AST)
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Ixia BreakingPoint VE is ranked 36th in Application Security Testing (AST) while Seeker is ranked 24th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 1 review. Ixia BreakingPoint VE is rated 0.0, while Seeker is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Seeker writes "More effective than dynamic scanners, but is missing useful learning capabilities". Ixia BreakingPoint VE is most compared with Spirent CyberFlood, whereas Seeker is most compared with Synopsys API Security Testing, Coverity, Contrast Security Assess, Polaris Software Integrity Platform and SonarQube.

    See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.