We performed a comparison between JFrog Container Registry and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), GoHarbor, Microsoft and others in Container Registry."It supports multi-cloud deployments across AWS, Azure, and GCP."
"We use the solution to compile the codes before publishing them. We utilize third-party containers and codes, downloading them to the JFrog Container Registry. Developers then access it from the JFrog Container Registry, and there's a specific job responsible for running and validating all security checks, ensuring compatibility. If there are any issues or if packages require updates, we manage those updates through this system."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring."
"The product's configuration is simple."
"I head the sales and marketing team. So, specifically on the feature set side, multi-tenancy is the one that I'm most familiar with. It's also the one that we found to be the most beneficial to us because it allows us to take clients that have multiple sites. For instance, one of our larger clients, which is a bank based out of South Africa, has offices in multiple countries. It allows us to multi-tenant each and create a tenant for each country within multi-tenanted architecture."
"Oracle Cloud Infrastructure is about as stable as the other CSPs, but Oracle Cloud is more common in Korea."
"The product enables users to create their own reports."
"The autonomous database functions are an excellent feature."
"The simple infrastructure of the service is very useful."
"It is a stable solution since it offers a very powerful performance to its users."
"In my experience, there was a bit of a learning curve at the beginning. It can be somewhat challenging to install and get started."
"One challenge we face is related to performance. Our integration involves GitHab and JFrog Container Registry, with pipelines fetching data from GitHub and JFrog Container Registry for third-party code. However, there are instances where this process can slow down the pipeline."
"The solution isn't very mature. The on-premises deployment has more features and the cloud needs to work to match those options."
"The solution requires tighter integration capabilities."
"Specific to the Oracle Cloud; while they have been able to showcase inbuilt features for Oracle applications, what doesn't really come across clearly is what happens when you want to host, work with, or integrate with applications outside of the Oracle stack."
"Portability of the VMware environment into the Oracle Cloud should be made more simple."
"There is room for improvement for stability."
"The AI capabilities and the power automate platform that Azure is offering seem to be way ahead of what Oracle is offering."
"The solution needs improvement in support, performance, and features."
"Technical support could be more responsive."
More Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Pricing and Cost Advice →
JFrog Container Registry is ranked 4th in Container Registry with 2 reviews while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is ranked 5th in Container Registry with 91 reviews. JFrog Container Registry is rated 8.0, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of JFrog Container Registry writes "Acts as a central repository and comes with code scanning feature ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) writes "Cost-effective and can be used to host OIC and APEX". JFrog Container Registry is most compared with Harbor, Amazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, Red Hat Quay and VMware Harbor Registry, whereas Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, Google Cloud, IBM Public Cloud and OpenShift.
See our list of best Container Registry vendors.
We monitor all Container Registry reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
