Joomla vs OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Joomla Logo
360 views|238 comparisons
77% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Joomla and OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Web Content Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Joomla is open source, therefore free. Only hosting, the time to build it along with the training time is your startup cost."
  • More Joomla Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    14th
    Views
    360
    Comparisons
    238
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Unranked
    In Web Content Management
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Content Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Web Site Management
    Learn More
    Overview
    Joomla is an award-winning content management system (CMS), which enables you to build Web sites and powerful online applications.
    OpenText Web Site Management gives you the ability to deliver information directly to users, within context, across multiple and multi-lingual channels. OpenText Web Site Management can create a richer, more interactive online experience, crossing the boundaries between websites, mobile devices, intranets, social networks, and Internet channels.
    Sample Customers
    Artisan Web and Print, HLVC Design, Media A-Team Inc, Holdingbay - Tristan Bailey, Molehill Web Works, Sysgen Media, Pappy Productions, Inc., Turn To The ProsPB Web Development, LC Publishing - LambCottage Foundation
    Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Givaudan, Anglian Water, Schweizerische Mobiliar Versicherungsgesellschaft AG, Karl Franzens Universit_t Graz, Miele, City of Edmonton, The Mosaic Company, Lone Star College System, St. Lucie County, City of Surrey, University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC), Sloan Valve, Detroit Diesel
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business100%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Content Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Joomla is ranked 14th in Web Content Management while OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Web Content Management. Joomla is rated 8.6, while OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Joomla writes "One of the most robust, stable, secure, feature-rich CMSs on the market". On the other hand, Joomla is most compared with SharePoint, whereas OpenText Web Site Management [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

    We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.