We performed a comparison between Juniper WXC [EOL] and Steelhead based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization.Earn 20 points
Juniper WXC [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in WAN Optimization while Steelhead is ranked 4th in WAN Optimization with 22 reviews. Juniper WXC [EOL] is rated 7.0, while Steelhead is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Juniper WXC [EOL] writes "Compression, acceleration & mulit-path are valuable, however look at alternatives as the Juniper WXC is end-of-sale". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Steelhead writes "Exceptionally stable and reliable but costly". Juniper WXC [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Steelhead is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform, WAAS, Citrix SD-WAN and Noction IRP.
See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.
We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.