Compare KeyCloud Storage as a Service vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, NetApp, Box and others in Cloud Storage. Updated: July 2021.
521,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"In addition to the standard licensing fees, there are fees for Azure, the VMs themselves and for data transfer.""Cloud is cloud. It's still expensive. Any good solution comes with a price tag. That's where we are looking to see how well we can manage our data in the cloud by trying to optimize the costs.""I know the licensing is a bit on the high-end. That's when we had to downsize our MetroCluster disks and just migrate to disks that were half used. We migrated into those just to reduce maintenance costs.""Cost is a big factor, because a lot of companies can't afford enterprise grade equipment all the time. They skimp where they can. I would recommend that they improve the cost.""Our licensing costs are folded into the hardware purchases and I have never differentiated between the two.""For NetApp it's about $20,000 for a single node and $30,000 for the HA.""Once we deploy the pay as you go model, we cannot convert this product as a BYOL model. This is a concern that we have.""They have a very good price which keeps our customers happy."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.
521,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: We're able to use the SnapMirror function and SnapMirror data from our on-prem environment into Azure. That is super-helpful. SnapMirror allows you to take data that exists on one NetApp, on a… more »
Top Answer: Our licensing is based on a yearly subscription. That is an additional cost, but because of the storage efficiencies that the NetApp gives, even with the additional cost of the NetApp license, you… more »
Top Answer: I think this is more of a limitation of how it operates in Azure, but the solution is affected by this limitation. There's something about how the different availability zones, the different regions… more »
Ranking
21st
out of 23 in Cloud Storage
Views
14
Comparisons
2
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Cloud Storage
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
KeyCloud Object and File Storage as a Service
ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVO
Learn More
Overview

Applications need sustainability and access to compete in hyper-competitive markets. Make an object and file storage choice that will have the economic and resiliency advantages to give a competitive edge.

KeyCloud's Storage-as-a-Service is dramatically more reliable, less complex and more cost-efficient than traditional storage! Traditional storage requires 3.6 TBs raw storage capacity for 1 TB of usable storage. Our object storage requires only 1.7 TBs of raw storage capacity for 1 TB of usable storage.

The leading enterprise-grade storage management solution, delivers secure, proven storage management services and supports up to a capacity of 368TB. Software service supports various use cases, such as: File shares and block-level storage serving NAS (NFS, SMB / CIFS) and SAN (iSCSI) Disaster Recovery, Backup, and Archive DevOps Databases (SQL, Oracle, NoSQL) Cloud Volumes ONTAP is offered in a standard single-node configuration or in a High Availability (HA) configuration.

Offer
Learn more about KeyCloud Storage as a Service
Take Control with Unified Cloud Storage

Sign up for a 30-day trial to see how Cloud Volumes ONTAP can help you optimize cloud storage costs and performance, while enhancing data enterprise-grade protection, security, and compliance - wherever your data lives.

Sample Customers
King's Hawaiian, Circle K
Rohit, AdvacnedMD, D2L, Trinity Mirror, Eidos Media, WireStorm, Cordant Group, JFK Medical Center, ALD Automotive, Healthix, City of Baton Rouge, ON Semiconductor
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company26%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Computer Software Company10%
Comms Service Provider10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider21%
Manufacturing Company9%
Media Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business7%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise80%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise74%
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, NetApp, Box and others in Cloud Storage. Updated: July 2021.
521,817 professionals have used our research since 2012.

KeyCloud Storage as a Service is ranked 21st in Cloud Storage while NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is ranked unranked in Cloud Storage with 28 reviews. KeyCloud Storage as a Service is rated 0.0, while NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is rated 8.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP writes "Enables us to manage multiple petabytes of storage with a small team, including single node and HA instances". KeyCloud Storage as a Service is most compared with , whereas NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is most compared with Azure NetApp Files, Red Hat Ceph Storage, VMware vSAN, IBM Spectrum Scale and Portworx Enterprise.

See our list of best Cloud Storage vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.