Mezmo vs syslog-ng comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Mezmo Logo
562 views|375 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
One Identity Logo
4,265 views|3,428 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Mezmo and syslog-ng based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Mezmo vs. syslog-ng Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface.""LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."

More Mezmo Pros →

"Syslog-ng has a separate config file in addition to the core configuration.""Syslog-ng has built-in features that we can use to create alerts for a SIEM solution. It isn't a true SIEM solution, but it's sufficient for the time being.""Syslog-ng provides easy access to all my logs. It helps me show managers and other clients precisely where an incident occurred. I also like it because you can integrate syslog-ng with multiple solutions to allow real-time monitoring.""For us, the most valuable feature is the use of compound search for searching logs at a specific time, by a specific user, or specific behavior.""The ability to extract and store the logs is the most valuable feature of syslog-ng."

More syslog-ng Pros →

Cons
"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team.""Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."

More Mezmo Cons →

"The filtering has room for improvement.""There is always the potential for additional integration and protocol extensions.""There is room for improvement in terms of observability.""It's hard to find people who know how to use syslog-ng. I often find problems with configurations, and solutions aren't integrated correctly with syslog-ng. For example, there might be data with extra decimals, or the collector agents are incorrectly named. It isn't a problem with the solution; it's a lack of professionals.""Syslog-ng has built-in features that we can use to create alerts for a SIEM solution. It isn't a true SIEM solution, but it's sufficient for the time being."

More syslog-ng Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Syslog-ng is a free open-source solution."
  • "Syslog-ng is open-source."
  • More syslog-ng Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:For us, the most valuable feature is the use of compound search for searching logs at a specific time, by a specific user, or specific behavior.
    Top Answer:The pricing is in the middle. I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with one being expensive and ten being cheap.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in terms of observability. Additionally, a possible new feature could be Kafka integration.
    Ranking
    51st
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    562
    Comparisons
    375
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    17th
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    4,265
    Comparisons
    3,428
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    378
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Datadog logo
    Compared 56% of the time.
    Cribl Stream logo
    Compared 44% of the time.
    Graylog logo
    Compared 22% of the time.
    Grafana Loki logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Logstash logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Elastic Security logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Also Known As
    LogDNA
    Learn More
    Overview

    Today’s enterprises must manage a massive amount of machine data. They require a platform that enables engineering teams to deliberately route and store structured and unstructured data for different teams with unique use cases. Legacy platforms weren’t made for this moment.

    Mezmo, formerly LogDNA, lets organizations ingest, process, route, analyze, and store all of their log data. Purpose-built for modern engineering teams—including developers, SREs, IT Operations, and Security Engineers—the Mezmo platform is trusted by thousands of companies for SaaS, cloud, and hybrid applications.

    Optimizing SIEM
    syslog-ng is the log management solution that improves the performance of your SIEM solution by reducing the amount and improving the quality of data feeding your SIEM.

    Rapid search and troubleshooting
    With syslog-ng Store Box, you can find the answer. Search billions of logs in seconds using full text queries with Boolean operators to pinpoint critical logs.

    Meeting compliance requirements
    syslog-ng Store Box provides secure, tamper-proof storage and custom reporting to demonstrate compliance.

    Big data ingestion
    syslog-ng can deliver data from a wide variety of sources to Hadoop, Elasticsearch, MongoDB, and Kafka as well as many others.

    Universal log collection and routing
    syslog-ng flexibly routes log data from X sources to Y destinations. Instead of deploying multiple agents on hosts, organizations can unify their log data collection and management.

    Secure data archive
    syslog-ng Store Box provides automated archiving, tamper-proof encrypted storage, granular access controls to protect log data. The largest appliance can store up to 10TB of raw logs.

    Sample Customers
    Instacart, Asics, Lime, Salesforce
    Tecnocom, University of Victoria, University of Exeter, Datapath
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Real Estate/Law Firm13%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Transportation Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government12%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise59%
    Buyer's Guide
    Mezmo vs. syslog-ng
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Mezmo vs. syslog-ng and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Mezmo is ranked 51st in Log Management while syslog-ng is ranked 17th in Log Management with 5 reviews. Mezmo is rated 9.0, while syslog-ng is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Mezmo writes "Has vastly increased our ability to reach SLA targets consistently". On the other hand, the top reviewer of syslog-ng writes "It's a user-friendly open-source solution that can replace or augment a commercial product in some cases". Mezmo is most compared with Datadog and Cribl Stream, whereas syslog-ng is most compared with SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server, Graylog, Grafana Loki, Logstash and Elastic Security. See our Mezmo vs. syslog-ng report.

    See our list of best Log Management vendors.

    We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.