We performed a comparison between LogRhythm SIEM and Mezmo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."As a healthcare company, what we use it for is compliance, then to protect our data from exaltation."
"We now have a central point of monitoring for all potential threats."
"The AI Engine can take an event and correlate it into something else giving us meaningful context regarding what is going on. We integrated it in with our ticketing system, so if an alarm fires, it raises a ticket in our system."
"I would say the most valuable feature of LogRhythm is that it has built-in UEBA functionality, among other basic Windows packages."
"The artificial intelligence engine."
"In terms of security, LogRhythm NextGen SIEM is great."
"The most valuable features would be the automation, reporting, and the support."
"It has helped us centralize and have better visibility into devices on our network. We are better able to respond to threats in a timely manner."
"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."
"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."
"We have gone through a few versions which has caused a lot of instability. We have logged a lot of hours with professional services."
"The web and on-premise console interface should be the same instead of having a separate engine for each."
"It is a product that is very hard to use."
"The customer support system is time-consuming."
"LogRhythm NextGen SIEM is currently based only on the Windows platform. This means that some of our customers have to purchase a Windows license elsewhere. If LogRhythm can move to a Linux platform or a proprietary platform, it would be very helpful."
"We would like to see more things out of the console into the web UI. I guess this is what they are doing in 7.4."
"My big thing is the easability. I don't like to go to two different systems. The fat client that you have to install to configure it, then the web console which is just for reporting and analysis. These features need to collapse, and it needs to be in a single solution. Going through the web solution in the future is the way to do it, because right now, it is a bit cumbersome."
"The built-in functionality of the solution for NDR, SOAR, SIEM, and EDS has room for improvement."
"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."
"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."
Earn 20 points
LogRhythm SIEM is ranked 7th in Log Management with 166 reviews while Mezmo is ranked 51st in Log Management. LogRhythm SIEM is rated 8.4, while Mezmo is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of LogRhythm SIEM writes "The solution reduced our investigation time from days to hours and assists in managing our workflows". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mezmo writes "Has vastly increased our ability to reach SLA targets consistently". LogRhythm SIEM is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh and Fortinet FortiSIEM, whereas Mezmo is most compared with Datadog and Cribl Stream. See our LogRhythm SIEM vs. Mezmo report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.