Compare LookingGlass Manage Intelligence vs. Recorded Future

LookingGlass Manage Intelligence is ranked 14th in Threat Intelligence Platforms while Recorded Future is ranked 7th in Threat Intelligence Platforms. LookingGlass Manage Intelligence is rated 0, while Recorded Future is rated 0. On the other hand, LookingGlass Manage Intelligence is most compared with Recorded Future and ThreatConnect, whereas Recorded Future is most compared with Digital Shadows, ThreatStream and FireEye iSIGHT Threat Intelligence.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
298
Comparisons
220
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
3,323
Comparisons
2,363
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Also Known As
ScoutVision, ScoutPrime, LookingGlass Cyber Threat Center, LookingGlass CTC, LookingGlass Cyber Solutions
Learn
LookingGlass
Video Not Available
Recorded Future
Overview

Recorded Future arms security teams with threat intelligence powered by patented machine learning to lower risk. Our technology automatically collects and analyzes information from an unrivaled breadth of sources and provides invaluable context that’s delivered in real time and packaged for human analysis or instant integration with existing security technology.
Offer
Learn more about LookingGlass Manage Intelligence
Learn more about Recorded Future
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Fujitsu, Regions, SITA, St. Jude Medical, Accenture, T-Mobile, TIAA, Intel Security, Armor, Alert Logic, NTT, Splunk
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company39%
Comms Service Provider9%
Government8%
Insurance Company6%
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.