"Along with its active directory infrastructure, this solution also possesses the ability to recover and exchange, making it a valuable backup tool."
"The most valuable feature is the capability to back up our SQL server."
"What I like the most about this solution is that I can change and access the Oracle backup file."
"The feature that was most valuable was that we could restore one mailbox and we could do different backups for different databases."
"Micro Focus Data Protector's most valuable feature is its interaction with the fiber share. It is easy to use, we use it to back up without any problem to VTLs, and can use the Fiber Channel that is still the TCP."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The most valuable features of this solution were the features we worked most with which were telemetry, and the scheduler."
"Data Protector's GUI is the most useful feature."
"The solution allows us to be able to backup and exchange directly, to backup Microsoft exchange."
"The solution has few features as it does not focus on managing anything in the application."
"The solution is not intuitive enough. I think they should work on the user experience and the graphical interface. These can be a lot better."
"We have a lot of requests for the Micro Focus team, particularly in terms of the Japanese data pattern, as it's not as good now. The Japanese data pattern accuracy of the Micro Focus Data Protector needs to be improved because there are a lot of false negatives and false positives. We are currently testing this and our product team has been communicating with the Micro Focus team."
"VMware backup integration and cloud recovery is lacking."
"Other tools seem to be easier to use."
"This solution is not scalable."
"We're not satisfied with the robustness and stability of the software since Micro Focus took it in-house. The GUI is one thing they could improve. It's still a bit archaic. Data Protector needs a more functional, user-friendly GUI."
"I would like to see a better user interface in the next release."
"They should design the solution so that it is much easier for deployment and make the UI easy to use."
More ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus Pricing and Cost Advice →
ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus is ranked 5th in Active Directory Recovery with 1 review while OpenText Data Protector is ranked 23rd in Backup and Recovery with 99 reviews. ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus is rated 0.0, while OpenText Data Protector is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus writes "Though this tool lacks the features to allow backups on the same server, it is very easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Data Protector writes "User-friendly, competitive, agent-based, and easy to manage". ManageEngine Recovery Manager Plus is most compared with Semperis Active Directory Forest Recovery (ADFR), Veeam Backup & Replication, Quest Recovery Manager for Active Directory Disaster Recovery Edition , Rubrik and Quest On Demand Recovery, whereas OpenText Data Protector is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Commvault Cloud, Veritas NetBackup, HPE StoreOnce and Symantec Data Loss Prevention.
We monitor all Active Directory Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.