Manhattan SCALE vs Redknee InBill [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Manhattan Associates Logo
193 views|53 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Amdocs Logo
views| comparisons
Featured Review
Ranking
14th
out of 44 in Billing Software
Views
193
Comparisons
53
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Billing Software
Comparisons
Learn More
Amdocs
Video Not Available
Overview
Manhattan SCALE provides an ideal blend of features, functions, and technology to solve complex supply chain execution challenges, regardless of where it is deployed - whether on premise or leveraging the power and flexibility of the cloud.

Redknee InBill is a convergent and complete wholesale billing solution that concurrently supports many business models and addresses multi-party settlement requirements. Leveraging the wealth of information stored in the rated events, InBill's analytical reports help operators better understand network usage patterns and help drive knowledgeable business decisions.

Sample Customers
3SUiSSES, AN Deringer, Alliance Boots, ALSPEC, Swizzels Matlow, Forzani Group, GSL, Happigo, Ingram Book Group, QKL Grocery Chain, RBA, Foschini
Afghan Wireless, BHT, Digicel, Digitel, EcoMobile, Indosat, Cello, OI, Redoo, Orange, T1 Apac, T1 Mexico, TIM, TSTT, Turk Telecom, Vattenfall, Vodacom, Vodafone

Manhattan SCALE is ranked 14th in Billing Software while Redknee InBill [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Billing Software. Manhattan SCALE is rated 10.0, while Redknee InBill [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Manhattan SCALE writes "Wave flows allow shipments to process in different ways". On the other hand, Manhattan SCALE is most compared with , whereas Redknee InBill [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Billing Software vendors.

We monitor all Billing Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.