McAfee SiteAdvisor [EOL] vs Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between McAfee SiteAdvisor [EOL] and Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, TitanHQ and others in Internet Security.
To learn more, read our detailed Internet Security Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use McAfee SiteAdvisor [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Internet Security solutions are best for your needs.
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:Menlo Security RBI's best feature is its threat isolation engine.
Top Answer:Menlo Security RBI could be more cloud-friendly, and its mobility could be improved. In the next release, I'd like Menlo Security RBI to include a native browser isolation as a hybrid for mobile… more »
Ranking
Unranked
In Internet Security
8th
out of 17 in Internet Security
Views
1,021
Comparisons
803
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
278
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Menlo Security Secure Internet
Learn More
Overview

Browse Safely with Advanced Warnings:
Identify whether sites are safe or not with our color-coded ratings. Prohibit access to undesirable websites and customize McAfee SiteAdvisor Enterprise to permit access as necessary.

Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation (RBI) fully enables the way people work by giving administrators the ability to set acceptable use policies to block malicious activity—including compromised websites, cybersquatting, file uploads and downloads, social posting, and other unknown threats. All web content and documents, across a broad browser ecosystem, are safely and accurately rendered in the cloud, away from your endpoints. Admins get all the granular controls and policies they need, while minimizing power draw and keeping the user experience intact. Enable rapid provisioning of users, while guaranteeing connectivity from any location. The Global Elastic Cloud promises secure, optimal web access for remote sites and mobile users worldwide.

Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Financial Services Firm13%
Manufacturing Company8%
Insurance Company7%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise60%
Buyer's Guide
Internet Security
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, TitanHQ and others in Internet Security. Updated: April 2024.
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

McAfee SiteAdvisor [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Internet Security while Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is ranked 8th in Internet Security with 1 review. McAfee SiteAdvisor [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation writes "Stable and scalable solution with a great threat isolation engine". McAfee SiteAdvisor [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Cisco Umbrella, Cloudflare Access, Perimeter 81 and Skyhigh Security.

See our list of best Internet Security vendors.

We monitor all Internet Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.