Menlo Isolation Platform [EOL] vs SonicWall CFS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SonicWall Logo
495 views|71 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Menlo Isolation Platform [EOL] and SonicWall CFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about TitanHQ, Forcepoint, Barracuda Networks and others in Web Content Filtering.
To learn more, read our detailed Web Content Filtering Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Menlo Isolation Platform [EOL]?
Darshil Sanghvi
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Licensing is on a yearly basis and the pricing is very reasonable."
  • More SonicWall CFS Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Web Content Filtering
    5th
    Views
    495
    Comparisons
    71
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Content Filtering
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about TitanHQ, Forcepoint, Barracuda Networks and others in Web Content Filtering. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Menlo Security Isolation Platform
    SonicWall Content Filtering Service
    Learn More
    Overview

    Traditional security solutions are reactive. First detect the threat. Then deal with it. But today’s threats are too sophisticated, too dynamic, too fast to get caught. Networks are often infected before alarm bells go off.

    Menlo eliminates all web and email security risks through isolation—providing the first truly 100 percent safe browsing experience. The Menlo Security Isolation Platform works by moving the fetch and execute functions of web browsing away from your network to our cloud-based platform. Only sanitized, non-executable content is rendered safely in users’ devices—providing a safe yet seamless experience that is no different than before. Suspicious web forms—a common target for hackers—can be rendered in read-only mode, preventing anyone from entering their credentials by accident or on purpose.

    Paylocity, Rochester School Department

    Sample Customers
    Macy's, HSBC, Bank of Hawaii
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Educational Organization12%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise41%
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Content Filtering
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about TitanHQ, Forcepoint, Barracuda Networks and others in Web Content Filtering. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Menlo Isolation Platform [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Web Content Filtering while SonicWall CFS is ranked 5th in Web Content Filtering. Menlo Isolation Platform [EOL] is rated 0.0, while SonicWall CFS is rated 0.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonicWall CFS writes "Reliable content filtering but need more traffic control". Menlo Isolation Platform [EOL] is most compared with , whereas SonicWall CFS is most compared with Barracuda Web Security and Filtering.

    See our list of best Web Content Filtering vendors.

    We monitor all Web Content Filtering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.