Compare Meridian ProjectTalk vs. Tactive Construction Management Software

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
45th
out of 54 in ERP
Views
52
Comparisons
33
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
54th
out of 54 in ERP
Views
2
Comparisons
2
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Oracle, IFS and others in ERP. Updated: October 2020.
442,845 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
ProjectTalk
Learn
Meridian
Video Not Available
Tactive Software Systems
Overview
Full-featured project management, collaboration and scheduling solution to which you access via the Internet.

Tactive – Web and mobile based construction management software for builders, contractors, EPC and MEP companies help complete projects on time and within budget.
Developed by experts from the construction and infrastructure industry and promoted by a construction conglomerate with over 60 years of operational expertise in various segments like Civil Engineering, Industrial Projects, EPC, Road & Rail, Housing and Public Infrastructure.

Offer
Learn more about Meridian ProjectTalk
Learn more about Tactive Construction Management Software
Sample Customers
IBM Cognos, Informative GraphicsNCC, AIROLINK, Gulf Asia, Knk group,
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Oracle, IFS and others in ERP. Updated: October 2020.
442,845 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Meridian ProjectTalk is ranked 45th in ERP while Tactive Construction Management Software is ranked 54th in ERP. Meridian ProjectTalk is rated 0.0, while Tactive Construction Management Software is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Meridian ProjectTalk is most compared with , whereas Tactive Construction Management Software is most compared with .

See our list of best ERP vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.