OpenText Diagnostics vs TeVista [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
580 views|392 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Rocket Software Logo
views| comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Diagnostics and TeVista [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
580
Comparisons
392
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
374
Rating
10.0
Unranked
In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus Diagnostics, MF Diagnostics
Learn More
Rocket Software
Video Not Available
Overview
Diagnostics software monitors application transaction health in traditional, virtualized and cloud environments allowing quick isolation and resolution of issues. It gives you a common tool to easily collaborate across the entire application lifecycle and release higher-quality applications. Diagnostics software provides deep drill down into transactions from the end user through the back end. And it uniquely serves as a single tool set for pre-production and production to diagnose application performance bottlenecks quickly and improve quality.

ASG-TeVISTA Performance Manager (ASG-TPM) is an end-end network and application performance monitoring solution, which pro-actively monitors network services and applications to ensure that business services are meeting the availability and response time requirements of their endusers. This is achieved through the deployment of one or more synthetic user agents across a customer's network to emulate end- user activity on the network and measure the system's response time. By monitoring from multiple locations and at different levels within the network ASG-TPM provides a comprehensive visibility of the performance of business critical services and the underlying IT infrastructure on which they depend.

Sample Customers
BSkyB, Alior Bank
U.S. Department of Defense, eBay, Kaiser Permanente, Coca-Cola, Northeast Foods, General Electric Company
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Financial Services Firm12%
Manufacturing Company8%
Educational Organization8%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise72%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OpenText Diagnostics is ranked 35th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 4 reviews while TeVista [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. OpenText Diagnostics is rated 7.8, while TeVista [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of OpenText Diagnostics writes "Very good for transaction level monitoring, but expensive and HP needs better support and training". On the other hand, OpenText Diagnostics is most compared with Dynatrace and Accedian Skylight, whereas TeVista [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.