OpenText UFT One vs Opkey comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenText Logo
11,332 views|6,941 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Smart Software Testing Solutions Logo
669 views|524 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText UFT One and Opkey based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It took about five years to break even. UFT is costly."
  • "The licensing and pricing model is confusing."
  • "It's an expensive solution."
  • "For the price of five automation licenses, you simply would not be able to hire five manual testers for two years worth of 24/7 manual testing work on demand."
  • "The price is only $3,000. I don't know how many QA analysts you would have in any given company. Probably no more than five or 10. So if it's a large corporation, it can easily afford $15,000 to $25,000. I don't see that being an issue."
  • "The way the pricing model works is that you pay a whole boatload year one. Then, every year after, it is around half or less. Because instead of paying for the new product, you are just paying for the support and maintenance of it. That is probably one of the biggest things that I hear from most people, even at conferences, "Yeah, I would love to use UFT One, but we don't have a budget for it.""
  • "The pricing fee is good. If someone makes use of the solution once a day for a half hour then the fee will be more expensive. For continuous use and application of the solution to different use cases, the fee is average."
  • "The price is one aspect that could be improved."
  • More OpenText UFT One Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well… more »
    Top Answer:My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.
    Top Answer:The product wasn't easy for developers to learn and pick up in the area revolving around scripting for automation, and there was a lot of resistance from developers, causing my company to rely on… more »
    Top Answer:CloudTestr and Opkey are both popular test automation tools for automating Oracle Cloud testing. Here is a comparison of the two tools CloudTestr Pros: Cloud-based Easy to use Supports a… more »
    Ranking
    2nd
    Views
    11,332
    Comparisons
    6,941
    Reviews
    20
    Average Words per Review
    694
    Rating
    7.9
    26th
    Views
    669
    Comparisons
    524
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus UFT One, UFT (QTP), Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
    Learn More
    Overview
    Our AI-powered functional testing tool accelerates test automation. It works across desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged enterprise-grade applications. Read white paper

    By following the principles of Automated Test First development, OpKey enables manual testers and SMEs in Agile teams to write automated tests as the features are being developed. Then using its patent pending Tool Agnostic engine, Opkey executes these tests with any automation tool that you have (selenium, HP UFT, Sahi, IBM RFT or any of the 8 tool that we support). You can execute your tests locally, on OpKey CLoud or popular servcies like Sauce Labs and Browser Stack.

    Sample Customers
    Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm32%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Insurance Company10%
    Healthcare Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise75%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Test Automation Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenText UFT One is ranked 2nd in Test Automation Tools with 89 reviews while Opkey is ranked 26th in Test Automation Tools. OpenText UFT One is rated 8.0, while Opkey is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of OpenText UFT One writes "With regularly occurring releases, a QA team member can schedule tests, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". On the other hand, OpenText UFT One is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT Developer, Katalon Studio, SmartBear TestComplete and UiPath Test Suite, whereas Opkey is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, UiPath Test Suite, SmartBear TestComplete and Katalon Studio.

    See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.