We performed a comparison between Silverfort and Azure Active Directory Identity Protection based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Silverfort provides customization options for authentication policies and real-time alerts, but some users have reported issues with risk assessment accuracy and setup complexity. On the other hand, Azure Active Directory Identity Protection has strong compliance and authentication features, as well as a reverse proxy option. Silverfort needs to improve its user interface, integration with third-party tools, documentation, pricing, and customer support. Meanwhile, Azure Active Directory Identity Protection needs to focus on improving its identity labeling, password management, auditor tool, solution models, Mac device compatibility, stability, and scalability.
Service and Support: Silverfort has excellent customer service with fast responses, knowledgeable staff, and a range of support options. On the other hand, Azure Active Directory Identity Protection has good technical support, but it does not receive as much praise as Silverfort's customer service.
Ease of Deployment: Silverfort is highly recommended for its simple deployment and intuitive interface. It seamlessly works with existing systems, which makes it an ideal tool to safeguard networks and sensitive information. On the other hand, Azure Active Directory Identity Protection requires more preparation and planning to set up.
Pricing: Silverfort's setup cost is dependent on the required level of support and complexity, while Azure Active Directory Identity Protection costs $5-$6 per user. Azure is rated eight out of ten in the SMA segment and has competitive pricing.
ROI: Silverfort offers password-free authentication and adaptive multi-factor authentication, resulting in a high ROI. Meanwhile, Azure Active Directory Identity Protection focuses on reducing identity-based attacks and providing useful security insights.
Comparison Results: Azure Active Directory Identity Protection is the preferred option over Silverfort. It has strong security measures, effective sign-in and audit logs, and impressive compliance and authentication capabilities. Its cost per user is reasonable, and the setup process is straightforward.
More Microsoft Entra ID Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Entra ID Protection is ranked 2nd in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) with 5 reviews while Silverfort is ranked 12th in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR). Microsoft Entra ID Protection is rated 8.4, while Silverfort is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Entra ID Protection writes "Enables smooth user sign-on experience, seamlessly deployment, and scales well". On the other hand, Microsoft Entra ID Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Identity, CrowdStrike Identity Protection, BloodHound Enterprise, Microsoft Entra Permissions Management and Microsoft Identity Manager, whereas Silverfort is most compared with Cisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID, Preempt, SailPoint IdentityIQ and RSA SecurID.
See our list of best Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) vendors.
We monitor all Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
