We performed a comparison between MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and Postman based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It provides all of the robust platform-enabled features."
"It provides various advantages in the integration field, including support for Azure services and cloud integrations."
"Technical support has been helpful."
"The most important features are the API management and API development."
"The ease of policy maintenance and API functionality are key features for me. They streamline business processes by allowing configurable control over policies, instead of writing codes and making maintenance more straightforward."
"Its best feature is that its plugins are somewhat unique in the market. We have budgets, Prime membership, and pre-plugins available in the marketplace that we can use immediately."
"Anypoint is very capable in terms of scalability."
"I believe the API connectivity within the cloud marketplace is most valuable."
"It is easy and simple to use and install. It is compatible with Linux, Mac or Windows."
"It's user-friendly. Anybody can learn it within five to seven minutes."
"The solution is stable."
"Postman helps us to automate the API testing in the team."
"The most valuable features of the solution are that it is easy to use and user-friendly."
"It is a stable solution."
"Postman is open-source and free to use."
"The solution has a great user interface and collection of features."
"One improvement is maybe to add a plugin in the API manager. Let's say an organisation is using SOAP services or legacy APIs. Maybe I don't want to migrate it to rest API, but my plugin should be able to convert Jason to XML. Basically, protocol transformation features in API Manager."
"The initial setup is very complex."
"It is not a very scalable solution."
"They should provide training and development programs to enable the skills and capabilities of users."
"Their studio performance is very slow, it requires a lot of memory, and should be improved."
"The solution's price is high."
"We find that the enterprise level is lacking scalability."
"The log management for this solution needs improvement."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"The scalability of the solution can be improved."
"The performance needs to be improved."
"We'd like to see some better UI in newer versions."
"They should provide more specific documentation on configuration."
"There is no support for the testing of the SOAP APIs."
"Postman needs more advanced data-driven testing."
"I rate the support for Postman a four out of five."
More MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is ranked 4th in API Management with 47 reviews while Postman is ranked 9th in API Management with 52 reviews. MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is rated 8.2, while Postman is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager writes "Responsive technical support, low tickets issued showing great stability, and limitless expansion". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Postman writes "Reliable and easy to expand with a helpful API network". MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, Kong Gateway Enterprise and IBM API Connect, whereas Postman is most compared with Apache JMeter, ReadyAPI Test, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio and API Fortress. See our MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager vs. Postman report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.