Charles NanaNetwork Security Engineer at Galaxy Backbone Ltd
"You're going to get what you pay for. If you're not willing to pay the price of Cisco, you're not going to get a product that's as good as Cisco. I don't think Cisco is overpriced, because for the last two years I've been comparing it to Microsoft and Cisco has been cheaper and given us more features."
"In my previous organization, avoiding four instances of CryptoLocker within an estimated six month period is approximately $600,000 in lost time and effort. Our five year cost was about a million dollars, and the four outages that we had equated to 65 percent of that five year cost."
"The licensing was all transferred."
"Compared to Cisco's on-prem service, the cost is the same, but you don't have to pay for the hardware and you don't have to maintain the system, as far as upgrades and hardware failures are concerned. It is cheaper to operate on their cloud service than it is to operate with their on-prem service."
"Cisco Secure Email and the support are priced well. It's not cheap, but there are other solutions that offer less and cost so much. For example, Microsoft is more expensive than Cisco."
"There are additional fees for adding features."
"At times, we feel the pricing is a bit too high, but then, there is also room for discounts. We enjoy a lot of discounts, and that is why we are still with them. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
Customers of all sizes face the same daunting challenge: email is simultaneously the most important business communication tool and the leading attack vector for security breaches. Cisco Email Security enables users to communicate securely and helps organizations combat Business Email Compromise (BEC), ransomware, advanced malware, phishing, spam, and data loss with a multilayered approach to security.
Email under control & safe
Email is the lifeblood of any legal practice. Confidential information is exchanged continuously through email, whether among internal teams, with clients, the opposition, or the courts. Unfortunately, legal practitioners are saddled with a perfect storm of dealing with the most highly sensitive information within extremely vulnerable email. Few solutions make it easy for attorneys and staff to manage complicated and highly sensitive, content-based legal workflows. mxHERO comes to the rescue, providing an innovation that changes almost nothing for users yet changes almost everything with regards to security and manageability of email correspondence.
RMail is an all-in-one solution for powerful email, with simple-to-use open tracking, delivery proof, email encryption, electronic signatures, large file transfer functionality and more.
mxHERO for Legal is ranked 53rd in Email Security while RPost RMail is ranked 49th in Email Security. mxHERO for Legal is rated 0.0, while RPost RMail is rated 0.0. On the other hand, mxHERO for Legal is most compared with , whereas RPost RMail is most compared with .
See our list of best Email Security vendors.
We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.