We performed a comparison between Invicti and PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The scanner and the result generator are valuable features for us."
"Invicti is a good product, and its API testing is also good."
"Crawling feature: Netsparker has very detail crawling steps and mechanisms. This feature expands the attack surface."
"Scan, proxify the application, and then detailed report along with evidence and remediations to problems."
"It correctly parses DOM and JS and has really good support for URL Rewrite rules, which is important for today's websites."
"The dashboard is really cool, and the features are really good. It tells you about the software version you're using in your web application. It gives you the entire technology stack, and that really helps. Both web and desktop apps are good in terms of application scanning. It has a lot of security checks that are easily customizable as per your requirements. It also has good customer support."
"One of the features I like about this program is the low number of false positives and the support it offers."
"The most valuable feature of Invicti is getting baseline scanning and incremental scan."
"The intercepting feature is the most valuable."
"The solution has a pretty simple setup."
"The solution is quite helpful for session management and configuration."
"The feature that we have found most valuable is that it comes with pre-set configurations. They have a set of predefined options where you can pick one and start scanning. We also have the option of creating our own configurations, like how often do the applications need to be scanned."
"There is no other tool like it. I like the intuitiveness and the plugins that are available."
"The solution scans web applications and supports APIs, which are the main features I really like."
"The most valuable feature is Burp Collaborator."
"We are mostly using it for scanning the entire website. So, we basically create a script with the entire website and then run it for different injections."
"Maybe the ability to make a good reporting format is needed."
"The custom attack preparation screen might be improved."
"The higher level vulnerabilities like Cross-Site Scripting, SQL Injection, and other higher level injection attacks are difficult to highlight using Netsparker."
"Netsparker doesn't provide the source code of the static application security testing."
"The solution's false positive analysis and vulnerability analysis libraries could be improved."
"The scanner itself should be improved because it is a little bit slow."
"The support's response time could be faster since we are in different time zones."
"The solution needs to make a more specific report."
"We wish that the Spider feature would appear in the same shape that it does in previous versions."
"I am from Brazil. The currency exchange rate from a dollar to a Brazilian Real is quite steep. It is almost six to one. It would be good if it can be sold in the local currency, and its price is cheaper for us."
"The price could be better. The rest is fine."
"The Burp Collaborator needs improvement. There also needs to be improved integration."
"The technical support team's response time is mostly delayed and should be improved."
"The reporting needs to be improved; it is very bad."
"There should be a heads up display like the one available in OWASP Zap."
"A lot of our interns find it difficult to get used to PortSwigger Burp's environment."
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Invicti is ranked 20th in Application Security Tools with 25 reviews while PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is ranked 9th in Application Security Tools with 55 reviews. Invicti is rated 8.2, while PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Invicti writes "A customizable security testing solution with good tech support, but the price could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional writes "The solution is versatile and easy to deploy, but it needs to give more detailed security reports". Invicti is most compared with OWASP Zap, Acunetix, Qualys Web Application Scanning, Fortify WebInspect and HCL AppScan, whereas PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is most compared with OWASP Zap, Fortify WebInspect, Acunetix, HCL AppScan and Nucleus. See our Invicti vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.