Compare NeuVector vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Snyk, Mirantis and others in Container Security. Updated: September 2021.
534,299 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."

More NeuVector Pros »

"The runtime mechanism on the solution is very useful. It's got very good network mapping between containers. If you have more than one container, you can create a content data link between them.""The product is quite good for providing multi-clouds or cross-cloud security from a single-pane -of-glass.""I would say Twistlock is a fairly sophisticated tool.""One of the most valuable features is the compliance of RedLock, which we are using for any issues with security. It flags them and that's the primary objective of that feature.""I was looking for a vulnerability scanner and I was looking for one place in which I could find everything. This tool not only does vulnerability scanning, but it also gives me an asset management tool.""It scans our containers in real time. Also, as they're built, it's looking into the container repository where the images are built, telling us ahead of time, "You have vulnerabilities here, and you should update this code before you deploy." And once it's deployed, it's scanning for vulnerabilities that are in production as the container is running.""The policies that come prepackaged in the tool have been very valuable to us. They're accurate and they provide good guidance as to why the policy was created, as well as how to remediate anything that violates the policy.""You can also integrate with Amazon Managed Services. You can also get a snapshot in time, whether that's over a 24-hour period, seven days, or a month, to determine what the estate might look like at a certain point in time and generate reports from that for vulnerability management forums."

More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Pros »

Cons
"We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines."

More NeuVector Cons »

"The innovation side of the solution could be more efficient and more detailed.""Palo Alto should work on ease-of-use and the user-friendliness to be more competitive with some competing products.""In terms of improvement, there are some small things like hardening and making sure the Linux resources are deployed well but that's more at an operational level.""The feedback that we have given to the Palo Alto team is that the UI can be improved. When you press the "back" button on your browser from the Investigate tab, the query that you're working on just disappears. It won't keep the query on the "back" button.""We would like it to have more features from the risk and compliance perspectives.""The challenge that Palo Alto and Prisma have is that, at times, the instructions in an event are a little bit dated and they're not usable. That doesn't apply to all the instructions, but there are times where, for example, the Microsoft or the Amazon side has made some changes and Palo Alto or Prisma was not aware of them. So as we try to remediate an alert in such a case, the instructions absolutely do not work. Then we open up a ticket and they'll reply, "Oh yeah, the API for so-and-so vendor changed and we'll have to work with them on that." That area could be done a little better.""The integration of the Compute function into the cloud monitoring function—because those are two different tools that are being combined together—could use some more work. It still feels a little bit disjointed.""It's not really on par with, or catering to, what other products are looking at in terms of SAST and DAST capabilities. For those, you'd probably go to the market and look at something like Veracode or WhiteHat."

More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Licensing fees are paid yearly."

More NeuVector Pricing and Cost Advice »

"One thing we're very pleased about is how the licensing model for Prisma is based on work resources. You buy a certain amount of work resources and then, as they enable new capabilities within Prisma, it just takes those work resource units and applies them to new features. This enables us to test and use the new features without having to go back and ask for and procure a whole new product, which could require going through weeks, and maybe months, of a procurement process.""The pricing and the licensing are both very fair... The biggest advice I would give in terms of costs would be to try to understand what the growth is going to look like. That's really been our biggest struggle, that we don't have an idea of what our future growth is going to be on the platform. We go from X number of licenses to Y number of licenses without a plan on how we're going to get from A to B, and a lot of that comes as a bit of a surprise. It can make budgeting a real challenge for it.""From my exposure so far, they have been really flexible on whatever your current state is, with a view to what the future state might be. There's no hard sell. They "get" the journey that you're on, and they're trying to help you embrace cloud security, governance, and compliance as you go.""If a competitor came along and said, "We'll give you half the price," that doesn't necessarily mean that's the right answer, at all. We wouldn't necessarily entertain it that way. Does it do what we need it to do? Does it work with the things that we want it to work with? That is the important part for us. Pricing wasn't the big consideration it might be in some organizations. We spend millions on public cloud. In that context, it would not make sense to worry about the small price differences that you get between the products.""The pricing and licensing are expensive compared to the other offerings that we considered.""I don't know a better way to do it, but their licensing is a little confusing. That's due to the breadth of different types of technologies they are trying to cover. The way you license depends on where you're securing. When they were Twistlock it was a simple licensing scheme and you could tell what you were doing. Now that they've changed that scheme with Palo Alto, it is quite confusing. It's very difficult to predict what your costs are going to be as you try to expand coverage.""The pricing is good. They gave us some good discounts right at the end of the year based on the value that it brings, visibility, and the ability to build in cloud, compliance, and security within one dashboard.""The licensing cost is a bit high on the compute side."

More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.
534,299 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward.
Top Answer: Licensing fees are paid yearly.
Top Answer: Our work has expanded. We are not only working with Kubernetes. We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines. We are looking for options that would support both. I… more »
Top Answer: Prisma Cloud helps support DevSecOps methodologies, making those responsibilities easier to manage.
Top Answer: We pay a licensing fee on a yearly basis. It is not costly. However, the way it is priced is based on the number of incentives. The problem is, what is the number of incentives? We don't know. They… more »
Ranking
8th
out of 24 in Container Security
Views
493
Comparisons
397
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
307
Rating
8.0
1st
out of 24 in Container Security
Views
23,496
Comparisons
16,214
Reviews
14
Average Words per Review
1,805
Rating
8.1
Comparisons
Also Known As
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud, Prisma Public Cloud, RedLock Cloud 360, RedLock, Twistlock, Aporeto
Learn More
Overview

Vulnerability Management for the Build, Ship, and Run Pipeline
NeuVector scans for vulnerabilities during the entire CI/CD pipeline, from Build to Ship to Run. Use the Jenkins plug-in to scan during build, monitor images in registries and run automated tests for security compliance. Prevent deployment of vulnerable images with admission control, but also monitor production containers. Blazing fast, highly scalable image vulnerability analysis scans thousands or hundreds of thousands of images.

The move to the cloud has changed all aspects of the application development lifecycle – security being foremost among them. Security and DevOps teams face a growing number of entities to secure as organizations adopt cloud native approaches. Ever-changing environments challenge developers to build and deploy at a frantic pace, while security teams remain responsible for the protection and compliance of the entire lifecycle. Prisma™ Cloud by Palo Alto Networks delivers complete security across the development lifecycle on any cloud, enabling you to develop cloud native applications with confidence.

Offer
Learn more about NeuVector
Learn more about Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
Sample Customers
Figo, Clear Review, Arvato Bertelsmann, Experian, Chime
Amgen, Genpact, Western Asset, Zipongo, Proofpoint, NerdWallet, Axfood, 21st Century Fox, Veeva Systems, Reinsurance Group of America
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm11%
Manufacturing Company6%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company23%
Manufacturing Company15%
Healthcare Company15%
Comms Service Provider8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm8%
Manufacturing Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise35%
Large Enterprise50%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise78%
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Snyk, Mirantis and others in Container Security. Updated: September 2021.
534,299 professionals have used our research since 2012.

NeuVector is ranked 8th in Container Security with 1 review while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 1st in Container Security with 15 reviews. NeuVector is rated 8.0, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of NeuVector writes "Feature-rich, easy to set up, and has good support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks writes "Gives me a holistic view of cloud security across multiple clouds or multiple cloud workloads within one cloud provider". NeuVector is most compared with Aqua Security, Sysdig Secure, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes and CoreOS Clair, whereas Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with Aqua Security, Azure Security Center, Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management, Lacework and Amazon GuardDuty.

See our list of best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.