We performed a comparison between SUSE NeuVector and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: SUSE NeuVector is distinguished by its ISO certification verification and advanced automation. Trend Micro Cloud One offers comprehensive protection against vulnerabilities, login inspection, event tracking, and a bug bounty program. SUSE NeuVector could improve by adding support for scanning IaaS and virtual machines and enhancing its monitoring and reporting capabilities. Users also want better integration with other security solutions and greater visibility into the DevSec pipeline. Trend Micro Cloud One should focus equally focus on AWS and Azure while improving automation and robustness.
Service and Support: Customers are pleased with the technical assistance offered by SUSE NeuVector, finding it helpful, responsive, and knowledgeable. However, there are concerns about the complexity of the support process. Trend Micro Cloud One was highly praised for its customer service and support. Users valued the support team's expertise and liked the round-the-clock availability.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for SUSE NeuVector can be challenging, depending on the environment and complexity of the project. It may require custom scripts for integration into the pipeline, and more skilled personnel are needed as the complexity increases. Deploying Trend Micro Cloud One can take upwards of a month and requires some development experience. Those with experience consider the deployment to be straightforward, but it typically involves a team of engineers or a small group of people managing the solution.
Pricing: SUSE NeuVector users gave mixed feedback on the pricing, but some users mentioned that large customers can negotiate a better deal. Trend Micro Cloud One's pricing is considered a little high, but users said it falls within the middle range. There may be additional costs depending on the specific use case. The licensing contracts are annual, but there are options for monthly, quarterly, or yearly payments.
ROI: SUSE NeuVector is highly beneficial for industries such as financial services, offering a valuable return on investment. Trend Micro Cloud One stands out for its flexibility and ease of integration.
Comparison Results: Trend Micro Cloud One is the preferred choice over SUSE NeuVector. Users appreciate its comprehensive security features, scalability, and ease of setup. The pricing is considered reasonable, and the payment options are flexible. Trend Micro technical support is highly rated for its knowledge and expertise.
"The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost."
"The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable."
"When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly."
"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security."
"The UI has a lot of features."
"Virtual patching is one of the key features, which is executed with their IPS."
"The most valuable features are intrusion prevention and anti-malware capabilities."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security does not utilize a lot of resources which allows our users to keep working even during a scan."
"Vision One is versatile and can be integrated with many SIEMs. You're not limited to only one SIEM, such as Microsoft Sentinel. The API integrations are seamless, and we have all the documentation needed to integrate Vision One via API."
"The security is good."
"I really like Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's dashboard."
"The perfect package for all security platforms, providing more than any other endpoint solution."
"Detection response and cloud conformity are valuable features."
"We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines."
"SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."
"The documentation needs to improve a bit."
"The image-scanning features need improvement."
"SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful."
"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment."
"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline."
"The initial setup is easy for someone who operates container platforms on a daily basis. However, it could be difficult for those coming purely from informational security or another field of an IT."
"The firewall configuration should have been automated based on the understanding of the application, utilities, and protocols."
"There are also some loopholes because it's a new product that they have recently migrated to the cloud. We do see some issues with the policies we have assigned when it comes to a particular account. There are some issues with system support, such as a particular server kernel version that is not supported."
"Securing S3 using Trend Vision One - Cloud Security can cost too much. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has a tool that requires lots of privileges. From my understanding, it's only for static application testing, so they need to add dynamic application testing, and there should be more collaboration with the application testing tools on the market. We have not used this product, and I don't know if they plan to decommission it or something. They should focus on application security because this tool's unique feature is multi-cloud support. However, they should improve integration with tools for these kinds of use cases, especially application security and dynamic scanning. For example, I would like it to support Dell SecureOps. I'd also like to see some enhancements to API gateway security."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security seems to have a preference for AWS Cloud over Azure and would be improved by focusing equally on both."
"The pricing can get high."
"Documentation on cloud architecture and job architecture would be helpful."
"One area for improvement in Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is marketing; in particular, Trend Vision should update the marketing documentation. The information needs to be more comprehensive."
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
SUSE NeuVector is ranked 19th in Container Security with 7 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 7th in Container Security with 17 reviews. SUSE NeuVector is rated 7.8, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of SUSE NeuVector writes "Good value for money; great for policy management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". SUSE NeuVector is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Sysdig Falco and Sysdig Secure, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Aqua Cloud Security Platform. See our SUSE NeuVector vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors and best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
