Compare NGINX Web Application Firewall vs. NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall

NGINX Web Application Firewall is ranked 16th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 3 reviews while NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall is ranked 20th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. NGINX Web Application Firewall is rated 8.0, while NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of NGINX Web Application Firewall writes "A stable system with good security and load balancing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall writes "Offers Application Protection Against Web Attacks". NGINX Web Application Firewall is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, AWS WAF and Fortinet FortiWeb, whereas NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall is most compared with Imperva Incapsula.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Cloudflare, Reblaze and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: March 2020.
408,154 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature is that there is a link in the system that will help to analyze the security of an application when something abnormal is found.The most valuable feature is that I can establish different services from the firewall.It is a very good tool for load balancing.

Read more »

Since we are using this tool for protection purposes we really appreciate the hybrid security abilities; the main idea here is that we powerful protection our application needs.

Read more »

Cons
Setting policies and parameters through the UI should be more automated because the process is manual, where we can only edit one rule at a time.The configuration needs to be more flexible because it is difficult to do things that are outside of the ordinary.

Read more »

There is a need for expanded licensing terms and options. There's also a need for improved and more agile customization features. The user needs to be able to manage each policy as required; the functionality needs to empower the user. There should be a complete suite of desktop provider policies available to users. Overall, it needs to be more user-friendly.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The licensing fees for this solution are pretty expensive for what it does, but there is no alternative.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
408,154 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,209
Comparisons
960
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
467
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
185
Comparisons
95
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
398
Avg. Rating
7.0
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
NGINX WAFNSFOCUS WAF, NSFOCUS Web Application Security
Learn
F5
Video Not Available
NSFOCUS
Overview

Even when you understand security, it is difficult to create secure applications, especially when working under the pressures so common in today’s enterprise. The NGINX Web Application Firewall (WAF) protects applications against sophisticated Layer 7 attacks that might otherwise lead to systems being taken over by attackers, loss of sensitive data, and downtime. The NGINX WAF is based on the widely used ModSecurity open source software.

NSFOCUS understands how critical your web servers and applications are to your business and we have designed a closed-loop web application security solution to protect you from web attacks, data breaches and downtime.  This solution includes website protection through our Web Application Firewall (WAF) and pro-active vulnerability assessment using our Web Vulnerability Scanning System (WVSS).

Offer
Learn more about NGINX Web Application Firewall
Learn more about NSFOCUS Web Application Firewall
Sample Customers
m.a.x IT2016 G20 Summit
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Cloudflare, Reblaze and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: March 2020.
408,154 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.