NGINX App Protect vs Threatx comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
F5 Logo
3,410 views|2,539 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Threatx Logo
175 views|132 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between NGINX App Protect and Threatx based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing fees for this solution are pretty expensive for what it does, but there is no alternative."
  • "Our licensing costs are about $40,000 a year."
  • "Really understand the licensing model, because we underestimated that."
  • "There are no additional fees."
  • "NGINX is not expensive."
  • "The pricing is reasonable because NGINX operates on an instance basis."
  • "There is a license needed to use NGINX App Protect."
  • "There are not any additional costs we had to pay to use NGINX App Protect."
  • More NGINX App Protect Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution has yearly, three-year, and five-year subscriptions.
    Top Answer:NGINX App Protect could provide a better user interface.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    3,410
    Comparisons
    2,539
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    334
    Rating
    8.7
    Views
    175
    Comparisons
    132
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    NGINX WAF, NGINX Web Application Firewall
    Learn More
    Threatx
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    NGINX App Protect application security solution combines the efficacy of advanced F5 web application firewall (WAF) technology with the agility and performance of NGINX Plus. The solution runs natively on NGINX Plus and addresses some of the most difficult challenges facing modern DevOps environments:

    • Integrating security controls directly into the development automation pipeline
    • Applying and managing security for modern and distributed application environments such as containers and microservices
    • Providing the right level of security controls without impacting release and go-to-market velocity
    • Complying with security and regulatory requirements

    NGINX App Protect offers:

    • Expanded security beyond basic signatures to ensure adequate controls
    • F5 app‑security technology for efficacy superior to ModSecurity and other WAFs
    • Confidently run in “blocking” mode in production with proven F5 expertise
    • High‑confidence signatures for extremely low false positives
    • Increases visibility, integrating with third‑party analytics solutions
    • Integrates security and WAF natively into the CI/CD pipeline
    • Deploys as a lightweight software package that is agnostic of underlying infrastructure
    • Facilitates declarative policies for “security as code” and integration with DevOps tools
    • Decreases developer burden and provides feedback loop for quick security remediation
    • Accelerates time to market and reduces costs with DevSecOps‑automated security
    ThreatX’s attacker-centric approach against DDoS, Bot-based attacks, API abuse, exploitations of vulnerabilities, zero-day attacks, and more – provides unique, multi-layered detection capabilities to accurately identify malicious actors and respond. The ease of deploying ThreatX and the availability of our application security experts makes ThreatX the perfect blend of a product and a service to protect your web applications and APIs from today’s modern threat landscape.
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    BMC
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Comms Service Provider33%
    Insurance Company17%
    Computer Software Company17%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Insurance Company8%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
    769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    NGINX App Protect is ranked 15th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 19 reviews while Threatx is ranked 40th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). NGINX App Protect is rated 8.2, while Threatx is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of NGINX App Protect writes "Capable of complete automation but is costly ". On the other hand, NGINX App Protect is most compared with AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Noname Security, whereas Threatx is most compared with Cloudflare, AWS WAF and Salt Security.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors and best API Security vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.