We performed a comparison between Nozomi Networks and Waterfall Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi, Claroty, Tenable and others in Operational Technology (OT) Security."The feature I like best is its stability."
"Provides security for our operational technology environment for OT and IoT."
"The most valuable feature of Nozomi Networks is its security features."
"This is a professional solution which has been the most valuable aspect of its use."
"Proof of concept could be improved. It could be more tangible to the customer and the end users to have a video presentation or something like that."
"It should support more programmable logic controllers (PLCs)."
"The solution should include an integration library."
"The interface of this solution could be more user friendly. The initial set up could also be made more simple."
Nozomi Networks is ranked 1st in Operational Technology (OT) Security with 3 reviews while Waterfall Security is ranked 5th in Operational Technology (OT) Security with 1 review. Nozomi Networks is rated 9.4, while Waterfall Security is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Nozomi Networks writes "Has good security features and can be used for OT visibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Waterfall Security writes "Cyber security solution used for data transmission that requires training to make use of all of its powerful features". Nozomi Networks is most compared with Claroty Platform, Tenable OT Security, Dragos, Forescout Platform and Armis, whereas Waterfall Security is most compared with OPSWAT MetaDefender OT Security and Fortinet FortiGate.
See our list of best Operational Technology (OT) Security vendors.
We monitor all Operational Technology (OT) Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
