NSFOCUS WVSS vs Polyspace Code Prover comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
NSFOCUS Logo
56 views|26 comparisons
MathWorks Logo
1,773 views|1,161 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between NSFOCUS WVSS and Polyspace Code Prover based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use NSFOCUS WVSS?
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:When we work on safety modules, it is mandatory to fulfill ISO 26262 compliance. Using Prover helps fulfill the standard on top of many other quality checks, like division by zero, data type casts… more »
Top Answer:There are two main areas of improvement. * False negatives and false positives. * The speed of the validation itself. Another area I see for improvement is scalability, particularly when dealing with… more »
Ranking
Views
56
Comparisons
26
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
1,773
Comparisons
1,161
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
656
Rating
7.6
Comparisons
Also Known As
NSFOCUS Web Vulnerability Scanning System
Learn More
MathWorks
Video Not Available
Overview

The NSFOCUS WVSS uses OWASP and WASC vulnerability templates and forensic scanning technology to locate and prioritize dangerous vulnerabilities. It is kept up to date using the latest web threat intelligence and automatically recognizes Ajax, Flash, Javascript, Web 2.0 applications and more.

Polyspace Code Prover is a sound static analysis tool that proves the absence of overflow, divide-by-zero, out-of-bounds array access, and certain other run-time errors in C and C++ source code. It produces results without requiring program execution, code instrumentation, or test cases. Polyspace Code Prover uses semantic analysis and abstract interpretation based on formal methods to verify software interprocedural, control, and data flow behavior. You can use it on handwritten code, generated code, or a combination of the two. Each operation is color-coded to indicate whether it is free of run-time errors, proven to fail, unreachable, or unproven.

Sample Customers
G20 Summit 2016
Alenia Aermacchi, CSEE Transport, Delphi Diesel Systems, EADS, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, Korean Air, KOSTAL, Miracor, NASA Ames Research Center
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company34%
Computer Software Company15%
Transportation Company7%
Retailer5%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise76%
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

NSFOCUS WVSS is ranked 60th in Application Security Tools while Polyspace Code Prover is ranked 23rd in Application Security Tools with 5 reviews. NSFOCUS WVSS is rated 0.0, while Polyspace Code Prover is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Polyspace Code Prover writes "A stable solution for developing software components". NSFOCUS WVSS is most compared with , whereas Polyspace Code Prover is most compared with SonarQube, Coverity, Klocwork, CodeSonar and Parasoft SOAtest.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.