We performed a comparison between NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] and Parasoft SOAtest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST).Earn 20 points
NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Security Testing (AST) while Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 28th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 30 reviews. NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] is rated 9.0, while Parasoft SOAtest is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] writes "There were some incompatibility issues, but it's a fairly stable product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Reliable with a good interface but uses too much memory". NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, Coverity, Polyspace Code Prover and Klocwork.
See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.