Compare OPAQ vs. Zscaler SASE

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Umbrella Logo
39,999 views|31,174 comparisons
OPAQ Logo
92 views|72 comparisons
Zscaler SASE Logo
1,800 views|1,383 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, VMware, Palo Alto Networks and others in Secure Access Service Edge (SASE). Updated: April 2021.
479,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"There is a one-time cost of approximately $800 USD per user, and then a yearly support fee of about $50 per user.""Our costs were negotiated, and they are okay.""Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis.""Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.""Cisco has a model called ELA. With ELA, if you buy the solution you will have the complete security portfolio and you can pay it yearly or after three years, it depends on the contract.""I am not sure, I don't have the numbers in front of me, but I think it's $1.00 or so per device/month.""Cisco uses subscription models for the pricing and there are three subscription plans.""The licensing part for Umbrella is really flexible."

More Cisco Umbrella Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"It has been relatively reasonable for what it does. Some of the additional license costs based on the advanced next-generation firewall functions are quite high, and they should have certain features ready and available as a baseline rather than having to purchase additional licenses for it. Overall, the cost seems reasonable."

More Zscaler SASE Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) solutions are best for your needs.
479,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Its simplicity is most valuable. I can install it and get it up and running, and it can be pervasive across my business… more »
Top Answer: It has a reasonable price. It is certainly not as expensive as it used to be. It is in line with other offerings on the… more »
Top Answer: The API is very Cisco orientated, which is absolutely fine if you're using Cisco Firepower and SecureX kind of products… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The most valuable features of this solution are the CASB solutions, which is protecting their Office 365.
Top Answer: It has been relatively reasonable for what it does. Some of the additional license costs based on the advanced… more »
Top Answer: The interface needs a bit of work. It could be a little more streamlined and more intuitive.
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
OpenDNS
OPAQ Network
Learn More
Fortinet
Video Not Available
Overview

OpenDNS provides easy-to-implement Internet navigation and Web security solutions for families, schools, governmental organizations and businesses of all sizes. The services provided by OpenDNS increase the speed of navigating websites and prevent unintended access to phishing and malware sites as well as to any Web content that you configure to be restricted.   

OPAQ’s platform is purpose built to be partner friendly, empowering MSSPs, carriers and high value-add partners to easily integrate the SASE multi-tenant platform into their own offering and add value, to customers, with their Network Operations Center and Security Operations Center expertise and advanced professional services.

For the last 30 years, networks have been connecting users to applications in the data center, which was surrounded by a secure perimeter to keep apps and data safe from the outside. But with applications moving to the cloud, IoT becoming more common, and users connecting from everywhere, network security is no longer able to solve the fundamental challenge of security and is instead adding significant complexity and cost.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Umbrella
Learn more about OPAQ
Learn more about Zscaler SASE
Sample Customers
Chart Industries, City of Aspen, Eastern Mountain Sports, FLEXcon, George Washington University, Jackson Municipal Airport Authority, Ohio Public Library Information Network, PTC, Richland Community College, Smart Motors, Tulane University, VeriClaim
Sodexo, Volkswagen Group Retail, Alaska Airlines
Siemens, AutoNation, GE, NOV
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm16%
Consumer Goods Company10%
Comms Service Provider10%
Educational Organization6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider29%
Computer Software Company24%
Financial Services Firm6%
Government5%
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider26%
Computer Software Company25%
Financial Services Firm7%
Government6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise38%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise68%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, VMware, Palo Alto Networks and others in Secure Access Service Edge (SASE). Updated: April 2021.
479,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OPAQ is ranked 18th in Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) while Zscaler SASE is ranked 11th in Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) with 3 reviews. OPAQ is rated 0.0, while Zscaler SASE is rated 8.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler SASE writes "Easy to deploy, use, and manage, but needs more granularity and control over the interfaces and better licensing and support". OPAQ is most compared with Cato Networks, whereas Zscaler SASE is most compared with Cato Networks, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cloudflare Access, Netskope CASB and NetFoundry.

See our list of best Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) vendors.

We monitor all Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.