We compared VMware Tanzu Mission Control and OpenShift Container Platform based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
VMware Tanzu Mission Control and OpenShift Container Platform both offer competitive pricing, efficient setup processes, and positive customer service experiences. VMware Tanzu Mission Control is praised for its management capabilities, multi-cloud deployment, and security measures, while OpenShift Container Platform is lauded for its system integration, resource management, and application scalability. Users suggest VMware Tanzu Mission Control could improve on user interface and performance, while OpenShift Container Platform could enhance UI, system performance, resource management, and language support.
Features: VMware Tanzu Mission Control offers comprehensive management capabilities, multi-cloud deployment, resource utilization, user-friendly interface, security measures, and automation. OpenShift Container Platform focuses on integration, resource management, security, customization, and scalability of applications.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for VMware Tanzu Mission Control is minimal and straightforward, with no additional complexities. The licensing process is hassle-free and transparent, allowing flexibility for various deployment scenarios. In comparison, the setup process for OpenShift Container Platform is also straightforward and efficient. The licensing model is commended for its flexibility in meeting the needs of different users., In terms of return on investment, VMware Tanzu Mission Control has proven to be valuable for managing and controlling VMware ecosystems. Users reported improved efficiency and resource allocation. On the other hand, OpenShift Container Platform offers significant improvements in resource utilization, scalability, efficiency, and cost savings. It has enabled increased productivity and revenue growth through optimized operations and streamlined workflows.
Room for Improvement: VMware Tanzu Mission Control has room for improvement in terms of user interface, performance, documentation, and customization options. OpenShift Container Platform, on the other hand, could benefit from enhancements in user interface, system performance, resource management, and support for different programming languages.
Deployment and customer support: In comparing the reviews, it can be concluded that the duration to establish a new tech solution with VMware Tanzu Mission Control typically takes one week for both deployment and setup phases, while with OpenShift Container Platform, it can range from one week for both phases to three months for deployment and an additional week for setup. The context in which these terms are used must be carefully evaluated., The customer service for VMware Tanzu Mission Control has been highly praised for being excellent, top-notch, and responsive. Users appreciate the promptness and efficiency of the support team. OpenShift Container Platform also receives positive feedback, with users valuing the promptness, responsiveness, and expertise of the support staff. Overall, users express satisfaction with the customer service experience provided by both platforms.
The summary above is based on 39 interviews we conducted recently with VMware Tanzu Mission Control and OpenShift Container Platform users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"Centralized control of container resources is most valuable."
"Openshift is a very developer-friendly product."
"The auto scalability feature, which is based on smart agendas, determined from pre-prepared rules is the most valuable feature. You can also create different routes for deployment. Deployment types can be provided with an identifier, such as an ARB deployment. This really helped in rolling out releases without disrupting services for the end-users."
"Some of the primary features we leverage in the platform have to do with how we manage the cluster configurations, the properties, and the auto-scalability. These are the features that definitely provide value in terms of reducing overhead for the developers."
"The stack in the software supply chain is one of the main reasons that we use OpenShift. When I came to this company, we bought hardware from IBM named Bluemix, and they used ICP, which stands for IBM Cloud Private."
"OpenShift is a user-friendly container platform with a solid GUI that helps you follow what is going on and gives you an overview of all your clusters. It's more user-friendly than the Kubernetes itself. The interface helps you learn the platform and provides access to some features or specific comments."
"The most valuable feature for me in the OpenShift Container Platform is the option to manage different containers and environments and also being able to switch among them."
"The most valuable features are the monitoring and logging functionalities."
"The most popular feature of VMware Tanzu Mission Control is its graphical user interface for describing network policies on the Service Mesh, which is highly integrable with other tools commonly used in supply chains such as security."
"Defining security metrics has proven beneficial for customers in maintaining a safe environment."
"VMware Tanzu Mission Control has many valuable features, such as ease of use and customization."
"The most valuable feature of VMware Tanzu Mission Control is the management functionality of the cluster life cycle. Additionally, the solution integrates well with other vendors, such as Velero for backups and Sonobuoy for compliance. Additionally, it works well in multi-cluster environments."
"The most important thing about the solution is its flexibility."
"It definitely gives the end customer a good overview and perspective of running applications in terms of overall workload footprint. TMC provides a very detailed description of your cloud-native application in the form of graphical visualization."
"A feature we find valuable is that other products can also be integrated with Mission Control. This means that we can see the status of specific clusters, as well as view the monitoring application logs all from one point."
"The most important feature of Tanzu Mission Control is its integration with the other products, especially with ESX and vSAN. This is a strong part of Tanzu Mission Control. In other solutions, such as OpenShift or Kubernetes, you can find similar features, but they don't have similar integration. With Tanzu Mission Control, you get a total solution with only one provider. You have the integration with the infrastructure, virtualization of networking, and virtualization of storage. You have a natural integration, and you don't have the problem of integrating it with different products or providers. Sometimes, different companies have good integration, but it is not always guaranteed. For example, many years ago, Cisco and VMware were good partners in networking, but when VMware started to sell ESX, the relationship was broken. This is the problem that you can face when you are using solutions from two different companies."
"I want to see more incorporation of native automation features; then, we could write a code, deploy it directly to OpenShift, and allow it to take care of the automated process. Using this method, we could write one application and have elements copy/pasted to other applications in the development process."
"Things are there and the documentation is there, however, there still needs to be quick guides available."
"From a networking perspective, the routing capability can be matured further. OpenShift doesn't handle restrictions on what kind of IPs are allowed, who can access them, and who cannot access them. So it is a simple matter of just using it with adequate network access, at the network level."
"OpenShift Container Platform could improve by having better integration."
"It has an option to install OpenShift without connecting it to the Internet. We tried this, but it was very hard. We couldn't manage to use that option. We wanted to use it offline for installations, updates, upgrades, etc., but we didn't find the offline installation and updates easy. This could be better."
"The product's interface is a bit buggy."
"With the recent trend of cloud-native, fully managed serverless services, I don't see much documentation about how a customer should move from on-prem to the cloud, or what is the best way to do a lift-and-shift. Even if you are on AWS OCP, which is self-managed infra services, and you want to use the ROSA managed services, what is the best way to achieve that migration? I don't see documentation for these kinds of use cases from Red Hat."
"The price needs to be improved in OpenShift Container Platform. When I choose this, the product is the first factor that we have to make a long analysis to compare the real cost for the other services. However, price is high."
"The network control and security policies must be improved."
"Cost is always a concern. Smaller companies might find the price a bigger issue."
"LYNX is a managed cluster solution that takes care of specific details within a cluster, such as sequences or services. I haven't seen this feature in Tanzu Mission Control."
"We want to see a new feature that helps build more security architecture like Zero Trust Security or shifting left in Kubernetes."
"It is not easy to build a solution with containers. It has a graphical user interface, but you need to have a lot of knowledge of Linux and how to work in the command mode. Its support can also be improved. Currently, its biggest disadvantage is that it is a new product, and the clients prefer to go for a solution that has been in the market for a long time. There are not that many people who know this product."
"Another area of improvement is pricing."
"Having a unified dashboard to manage all infrastructure, whether it involves additional IT infrastructure or modern apps, would be highly advantageous"
"The infrastructure is quite challenging."
OpenShift Container Platform is ranked 1st in Container Management with 36 reviews while VMware Tanzu Mission Control is ranked 3rd in Container Management with 12 reviews. OpenShift Container Platform is rated 8.2, while VMware Tanzu Mission Control is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of OpenShift Container Platform writes "Provides automation that speeds up our process by 30% and helps us achieve zero downtime". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Tanzu Mission Control writes "Gives a single pane to manage multiple Kubernetes environments and has competitive pricing". OpenShift Container Platform is most compared with Amazon EKS, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, Amazon Elastic Container Service, Rancher Labs and Kubernetes, whereas VMware Tanzu Mission Control is most compared with Rancher Labs, Kubernetes, Amazon EKS, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE and Docker. See our OpenShift Container Platform vs. VMware Tanzu Mission Control report.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
