• Home
  • OpenText File Transfer Service [EOL] vs. WS_FTP Server

OpenText File Transfer Service [EOL] vs WS_FTP Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText File Transfer Service [EOL] and WS_FTP Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Managed File Transfer (MFT)
22nd
out of 42 in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Views
426
Comparisons
390
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
OpenText
Progress Software
Overview

FTS can be embedded and branded as an integrated service within a customer's own business applications and portals. Any file exchanged through FTS can be monitored through OpenText™ Active Documents for end-to-end information exchange visibility and monitoring.

WS_FTP Server is a proven, effective, easy-to-use file transfer solution. Secure data in transit while integrating programmable methodologies that simplify file transfer tasks and improve efficiency. Improve control, visibility and security over file transfer activities by implementing safeguards against information leaks and data breaches.

Sample Customers
Anglian Water
BraunAbility, H&M Software, Killeen School, Positive Images UK, Scientific American, Sciforma, The Denver Broncos
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm21%
Government11%
Computer Software Company10%
Healthcare Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise68%
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OpenText File Transfer Service [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while WS_FTP Server is ranked 22nd in Managed File Transfer (MFT). OpenText File Transfer Service [EOL] is rated 0.0, while WS_FTP Server is rated 0.0. On the other hand, OpenText File Transfer Service [EOL] is most compared with , whereas WS_FTP Server is most compared with MOVEit, IBM Sterling File Gateway, Fortra's Globalscape Managed File Transfer, CompleteFTP and SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.