JFrog Pipeline vs Oracle Hudson CI comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
JFrog Logo
318 views|289 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
105 views|82 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between JFrog Pipeline and Oracle Hudson CI based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is the cheapest compared to the other platforms out there."
  • More JFrog Pipeline Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    22nd
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    318
    Comparisons
    289
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    32nd
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    105
    Comparisons
    82
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Shippable
    Hudson CI
    Learn More
    Overview
    JFrog Pipelines empowers software teams to ship updates faster by automating DevOps processes in a continuously streamlined and secure way across all their teams and tools. Encompassing continuous integration (CI), continuous delivery (CD), infrastructure and more, it automates everything from code to production. Pipelines is natively integrated with the JFrog Platform and is available with both cloud (software-as-a-service) and on-prem subscriptions.

    Hudson monitors the execution of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron. Among those things, currently Hudson focuses on the following two jobs:

    • Building/testing software projects continuously, just like CruiseControl or DamageControl. In a nutshell, Hudson provides an easy-to-use so-called continuous integration system, making it easier for developers to integrate changes to the project, and making it easier for users to obtain a fresh build. The automated, continuous build increases productivity.
    • Monitoring executions of externally-run jobs, such as cron jobs and procmail jobs, even those that are run on a remote machine. For example, with cron, all you receive is regular e-mails that capture the output, and it is up to you to look at them diligently and notice when it broke. Hudson keeps those outputs and makes it easy for you to notice when something is wrong.
    Sample Customers
    SAP, Today Tix, Cisco, Lithium, Pushspring, Packet
    Virgin Media
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    JFrog Pipeline is ranked 22nd in Build Automation while Oracle Hudson CI is ranked 32nd in Build Automation. JFrog Pipeline is rated 8.0, while Oracle Hudson CI is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of JFrog Pipeline writes "Testing against multiple run times, versions, and environments is a plus point". On the other hand, JFrog Pipeline is most compared with Jenkins, Bamboo, Harness, TeamCity and GitHub Actions, whereas Oracle Hudson CI is most compared with Jenkins.

    See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.