Compare Parasoft SOAtest vs. Quotium Seeker

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Veracode Logo
69,536 views|37,424 comparisons
Parasoft SOAtest Logo
7,026 views|3,553 comparisons
Quotium Seeker Logo
166 views|116 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, PortSwigger and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: June 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization.""I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good.""Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing.""If I compare the pricing with other software tools, then it is quite competitive. Whatever the price is, they have always given us a good discount.""Veracode is expensive. Some of its products are expensive. I don't think it's way more expensive than its competitors. The dynamic is definitely worth it, as I think it's cheaper than the competitors. The static scan is a little bit more expensive, around 20 percent more expensive. The manual pen test is more expensive, but it is an expensive service because it's a manual pen test and we also do retests. I don't think it is way more expensive than the competitors, but it's about 15 to 20 percent more expensive.""We use this product per project rather than per developer... Your development model will really determine what the best fit is for you in terms of licensing, because of the project-based licensing. If you do a few projects, that's more attractive. If you have a large number of developers, that would also make the product a little more attractive.""The pricing is really fair compared to a lot of other tools on the market.""It is very reasonably priced compared to what we were paying our previous vendor. For the same price, we are getting much more value and reducing our AppSec costs from 40 to 50 percent."

More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice »

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

More Parasoft SOAtest Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It's comprehensive from a feature standpoint.
Top Answer: I would recommend them. They have the ability to cover multiple languages and come with all the features you would… more »
Top Answer: SonarQube depends on completely what you configure the Rules. You will have the option of the Profile creation and can… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
SOAtest
Seeker
Learn More
Overview

Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.

The Seeker solution helps businesses find high-risk security weaknesses while fostering collaboration between development and security teams. It exposes vulnerable code and ties it directly to business impact and exploitation scenarios, providing a clear explanation of risks. By accelerating adoption of security testing technologies into the software development lifecycle (SDLC), customers across industries such as financial, health, energy and retail can get to market faster with increased stability and certainty.

Offer
Learn more about Veracode
Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest
Learn more about Quotium Seeker
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, Rekner
Lufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ Bank
El Al
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm29%
Computer Software Company10%
Insurance Company10%
Healthcare Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm10%
Manufacturing Company6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm46%
Government15%
Manufacturing Company8%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider16%
Manufacturing Company10%
Financial Services Firm9%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise52%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise49%
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise67%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, PortSwigger and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: June 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 16th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 1 review while Quotium Seeker is ranked 27th in Application Security Testing (AST). Parasoft SOAtest is rated 9.0, while Quotium Seeker is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Creates tests automatically based on recorded traffic". On the other hand, Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with SonarQube, Postman, SoapUI Pro, Coverity and SmartBear TestComplete, whereas Quotium Seeker is most compared with Contrast Security Assess.

See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.