Compare Parasoft SOAtest vs. Seeker

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Veracode Logo
69,854 views|37,366 comparisons
Parasoft SOAtest Logo
8,056 views|3,847 comparisons
Seeker Logo
views| comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Parasoft SOAtest? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, PortSwigger and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: November 2020.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.""They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.""For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization.""I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good.""Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing.""If I compare the pricing with other software tools, then it is quite competitive. Whatever the price is, they have always given us a good discount."

More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice »

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

More Parasoft SOAtest Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Veracode has offered a dynamic analysis testing solution for several years, having launched our first offering in 2015… more »
Top Answer: I would recommend them. They have the ability to cover multiple languages and come with all the features you would… more »
Top Answer: SonarQube depends on completely what you configure the Rules. You will have the option of the Profile creation and can… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Compared 50% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Also Known As
SOAtest
Learn
Veracode
Parasoft
Synopsys
Overview

Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.

Seeker®, interactive application security testing (IAST) solution, gives you unparalleled visibility into your web app security posture and identifies vulnerability trends against compliance standards (e.g., OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS, GDPR, CAPEC, and CWE/SANS Top 25). Seeker enables security teams to identify and track sensitive data to ensure that it is handled securely and not stored in log files or databases with weak or no encryption.

Offer
Learn more about Veracode
Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest
Learn more about Seeker
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, ReknerLufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ BankAccessOne, Rally®, Calix, FINRA, Dextra Technologies
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm30%
Insurance Company11%
Computer Software Company8%
Healthcare Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm7%
Media Company5%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm46%
Government15%
Manufacturing Company8%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider19%
Government8%
Manufacturing Company8%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise51%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise66%
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise67%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, PortSwigger and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: November 2020.
447,439 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 16th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 1 review while Seeker is ranked unranked in Application Security Testing (AST). Parasoft SOAtest is rated 9.0, while Seeker is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Creates tests automatically based on recorded traffic". On the other hand, Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with Postman, SonarQube, SoapUI Pro, Tricentis Tosca and Checkmarx, whereas Seeker is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.