Compare PingDataGovernance vs. SAS Data Governance

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
28th
out of 28 in Data Governance
Views
9
Comparisons
1
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
18th
out of 28 in Data Governance
Views
300
Comparisons
229
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Learn
Ping Identity
SAS
Overview

PingDataGovernance provides policy-based, fine-grained access controls for attribute-by-attribute data protection and filtering for regulatory compliance and consent management. It has a graphical user interface for business users to collaboratively build, test and enforce access control policies to data across user directories and APIs. It provides a centralized solution to authorize and filter API calls in real time—a huge benefit to managing and enforcing customer data privacy.

SAS Data Governance helps you maintain a consistent set of policies, processes and owners for your corporate information - including big data sets in Hadoop and Impala. You'll spend less time managing your data - and more time managing your business.

Offer
Learn more about PingDataGovernance
Learn more about SAS Data Governance
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Canada Post, Ceska pojistovna, Chantecler, Chubb Group of Insurance Companies, iJET, Invacare, Livzon Pharmaceutical Group, Los Angeles County, Transitions Optical, Triad Analytic Solutions, UNIQA, US Census Bureau
PingDataGovernance is ranked 28th in Data Governance while SAS Data Governance is ranked 18th in Data Governance. PingDataGovernance is rated 0.0, while SAS Data Governance is rated 0.0. On the other hand, PingDataGovernance is most compared with , whereas SAS Data Governance is most compared with Collibra Governance, Alation Data Catalog and Informatica Axon.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.