Plunet BusinessManager vs XTM Cloud comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Plunet Logo
302 views|217 comparisons
XTM International Logo
331 views|247 comparisons
Ranking
Views
302
Comparisons
217
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
331
Comparisons
247
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Plunet
Video Not Available
XTM International
Video Not Available
Overview

The translation management system Plunet BusinessManager provides a high degree of automation and flexibility for professional language service providers and translation departments. Using a web-based platform, Plunet integrates translation software, financial accounting and quality management systems.

XTM Cloud is the SaaS version of the software, while XTM Suite is the traditionally licenced application for installation on client’s servers.

Sample Customers
PTI Global, Conversis, JABA Translation, atrado, RWS GROUP, netwire
Big Point, Volvo, Firestone, Ricoh, Gap, Swiss Post, Spil Games
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm22%
Educational Organization12%
Comms Service Provider12%
Manufacturing Company10%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise78%

Plunet BusinessManager is ranked 6th in Translation Management Software while XTM Cloud is ranked 5th in Translation Management Software. Plunet BusinessManager is rated 0.0, while XTM Cloud is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Plunet BusinessManager is most compared with XTRF, whereas XTM Cloud is most compared with SDL Trados Studio, Memsource, DeepL Translator and memoQ Server.

See our list of best Translation Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Translation Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.