Polteq Performance Testing Services vs QA Madness Mobile Application Testing comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
17
Comparisons
2
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
29
Comparisons
5
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

We have been conducting test assignments, improving test processes and solving test issues for companies and organizations for 20 years. Software, apps, mobile devices and websites: we test it all. And so we help improve quality. Skilled, flexible and enthusiastic.

In these 20 years, Polteq has grown into one of the largest specialized providers of testing services in the Netherlands and Belgium. We thank our relations for the trust and pleasant cooperation and look forward to the next 20 years!

For over 10 years, QA Madness has been providing testing services to businesses around the world, and we’re ready to help you grow your business. With a wide range of QA testing services and solutions completed by a team of quality assurance experts, you’re making the right decision when you choose QA Madness for your application testing needs.

Source: Why QA Madness ? - Software outsource testing service QA Madness Software testing company

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
DevPocket, Ewave, Fight Camp, Above The Fray

Polteq Performance Testing Services is ranked 66th in Application Testing Services while QA Madness Mobile Application Testing is ranked 56th in Application Testing Services. Polteq Performance Testing Services is rated 0.0, while QA Madness Mobile Application Testing is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Polteq Performance Testing Services is most compared with , whereas QA Madness Mobile Application Testing is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Testing Services vendors.

We monitor all Application Testing Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.